Talk:Cal (Unix)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Does the interesting output of cal, when called for september 1752, deserve mentioning? It is:
$ cal 9 1752 September 1752 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
The situation is related with leap year issue.
[edit] cal 9 1752
cal 9 1752 _does_ deserve mention as it has a very interesting story. it isn't related to leap-year at all, but rather has to do with a bug in the original cal code. Instead of fixing the copies of code that had been already distributed, representatives from AT&T convinced the vatican to remove those days from history.
- lol, very funny! But I'd better put in a warning that this isn't true, just incase anybody should think that.... :o
- Mathmo 10:04, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Julian
While we are on 1752 shouldn't the Julian calendar be mentioned too? Mathmo 10:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)