Talk:CALABARZON
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of Tambayan Philippines, the WikiProject and notice board for topics related to the Philippines. To participate, visit the Tambayan for more information. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] All caps?
Is there a reason this is in all caps? -- Cyrius|✎ 23:47, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- It's an acronym that stands for the provinces it is composed of. CAvite, Laguna, Batangas, Rizal, and Quezon. TheCoffee 02:35, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Eyeballs slid right over that part of the article, whoops. -- Cyrius|✎ 02:59, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] CalabarzonA?
We need a local, I think, to clarify the CALABARZON/CALABARZONA issue?
The latter's article seems to indicate that the latter supercedes the former, as being composed of the latter's five components plus one more that's unconnected to the others, is that it? Or am I missing something? DS 14:19, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
- I've never heard of this "CALABARZONA". Aurora province is in a different region, and to my knowledge it was never part of CALABARZON. No Google hits for "calabarzona". If this is supposed to be a hoax, it's pretty lame. Coffee 16:41, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
Actually, the original components of the Southern Tagalog Region (Region 4) prior to its break-up were: Aurora, CALABARZON, and MIMAROPA. There was a time when the splitting of Region 4 was not official yet, that is, when CALABARZON and MIMAROPA were sub-regions of Region 4. Then there was the issue with Aurora province, so CALABARZON became CALABARZONA for a while.When the split into official regions happened, that was the time when Aurora was officially transferred to Region 3, thus the duration of calling the sub-region CALABARZONA was brief, hence its non-popularity. Although i do remember that some people argued back then that CALABARZON is ok to use over CALABARZONA since the "AR" string would somehow incorporate Aurora into the acronym...Meynardtengco 17:34, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
From my school days, Aurora province has always been part of Region 3 and not region 4. The proper acronym is indeed CALABARZON. Usagichin 06:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal laguna.png
Image:Ph seal laguna.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 22:52, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal rizal.png
Image:Ph seal rizal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 22:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal cavite.png
Image:Ph seal cavite.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
