California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||
Argued October 8, 1986 Decided January 13, 1987 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||
The California Fair Employment and Housing Act in 12945(b)(2), which requires employers to provide leave and reinstatement to employees disabled by pregnancy, is consistent with federal law. | ||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||
Chief Justice: William Rehnquist Associate Justices: William J. Brennan, Jr., Byron White, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, Lewis F. Powell, Jr., John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia |
||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||
Majority by: Marshall, J., in Parts I, II, III-B, III-C, and IV Joined by: Brennan, J., Blackmun, J., O'Connor, J. Concurrence by: Stevens, J. Concurrence by: Scalia, J. Dissent by: White, J. Joined by: Rehnquist, C.J., Powell, J. |
||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||
Cal. Gov't Code ยง 12945(b)(2), Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 |
California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra, United States Supreme Court. The case was about whether a state may require employers to provide greater pregnancy benefits than required by federal law, as well as the ability to require pregnancy benefits to women without similar benefits to men.
, was a case before the[edit] See also
[edit] External links
- California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra at FindLaw.com.
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.