User talk:Cailil/pepper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]] • contribs • count • logs • page moves • block log • email)
This report is a detailed list of a disruption and tendentious editing

Please note this page has been carefully written to abide by the full policy of assume good faith and is written with the final paragraph in mind

[The assume good faith guideline] does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary. Actions inconsistent with good faith include repeated vandalism, confirmed malicious sockpuppetry, and lying. Assuming good faith also does not mean that no action by editors should be criticized, but instead that criticism should not be attributed to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice.

Contents

[edit] Policy violations

[edit] Pushing against consensus

[edit] Breach of civility requirements

[edit] Failing to assume good faith of others

[edit] Attempting to "game the system"

[edit] Soapboxing

[edit] Forum shopping

[edit] Disruptive editing

[edit] Using WP as a battleground

[edit] Arbcom principles

Taken from the recently closed Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Strider12

Purpose of Wikipedia
1) The purpose of Wikipedia is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Use of the site for other purposes, such as advocacy or propaganda, furtherance of outside conflicts, publishing or promoting original research, and political or ideological struggle, is prohibited.
Decorum
2) Wikipedia users are expected to behave reasonably, calmly, and courteously in their interactions with other users; to approach even difficult situations in a dignified fashion and with a constructive and collaborative outlook; and to avoid acting in a manner that brings the project into disrepute. Unseemly conduct, such as personal attacks, incivility, assumptions of bad faith, trolling, harassment, disruptive point-making, and gaming the system, is prohibited.
Editorial process
3) Wikipedia works by building consensus. This is done through the use of polite discussion—involving the wider community, if necessary—and dispute resolution, rather than through disruptive editing. Editors are each responsible for noticing when a debate is escalating into an edit war, and for helping the debate move to better approaches by discussing their differences rationally. Edit-warring, whether by reversion or otherwise, is prohibited; this is so even when the disputed content is clearly problematic, with only a few exceptions. Revert rules should not be construed as an entitlement or inalienable right to revert, nor do they endorse reverts as an editing technique.

[edit] Warnings

[edit] Editing characteristics

[edit] Editting style

  • Flamebaiting comments to other editors
  • Accuses user who warn them of not assuming good faith

[edit] Edit patterns

  • Personal attacks on other editors.
  • Pushing fringe ideas & publications
  • Attenuating discussion to the point of not hearing consensus or policy.
  • Personal attacks and/or unconstructive, uncivil and trolling posts to User talk pages of those who disagree with their POV
  • Acting in concert with others to combat other editors in violation of WP:NOT#BATTLE

[edit] Conclusion