User talk:Caesarjbsquitti

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thanks for the messages...

Dear Caesarjbsquitti,

Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

• Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Community Portal
• Frequently Asked Questions
• How to edit a page
• How to revert to a previous version of a page
• Tutorial
• Copyrights
• Shortcuts

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with two hyphens followed by four tildes --~~~~. The software that runs Wikipedia will automatically convert this into a signature which contains your username and the date and time you posted the message, so other users don't get confused.

I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself on your userpage, you should start by adding {{User:PEAR/welcomed}} to your userpage.

--PEAR 16:31, August User:PEAR/FriendlyDay 2006 (UTC)

Thank you...for the welcome, I hope that I may be able to lend my abilities to your source. Have some patience with my lack of understanding your system.

Thanks again.

"The new truth about truth lies in the truth that Truth can lie ! CS"

--Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 15:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] signing

Hi! Just FYI, you should sign the edits you make to discussion ("talk") pages, but not the edits you make to actual articles. Rlitwin 22:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit at Canada

For your convenience, I am pasting your addition to Canada below. It doesn't belong in the top-level Canada article, but it may belong at Health care in Canada after some polishing. Thanks. Jkelly 22:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Health Care system

Canada's Health care system has been called a public system, a socilized heath care system but in fact it is merely pulically funded, although many politicians and reports refer incorrectly to this system as a public one. ( this a good example of a half-truth - half-truth)

It was a very famous socialist politician Tommy Douglas the son of a preacher who instituted government funded health care.

Canadians receive 'free' health care paid for by a provincially funded tax supported fund. Some provinces employ a monthly insurance premium, Ontario does not. Some limited services are not covered.

Most doctors are in reality 'corporations' and clinics are privately owmed by doctor consortiums. Doctors, family doctors receive a fee per visit from the Government. A system that rewards repeat visits, referrals, and testing. Doctors in Canada, except for some hospital doctors do not receive a yearly salary.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons is a self regulating department that handles physician complaints.

Canadians are currently experiencing a doctor shortage due to the market forces at play and the fee structure, that penalizes doctors income relative to the supply of doctors.

A recent comparative report on Health Systems in the World, 'Wyatt/Watson' ranked Canada's Health system 20th in the world, better than that in the USA, ranked 24th. France and Italy were ranked in the top two.

[edit] Feedback

Feel free to send me suggestions.

Thanks

--Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Mathematical definition of God? Have you seen intelligent math? — Dunc|☺ 16:36, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "No original research" policy

Caesar, based on edits you've been making concerning your insights about truth, lie, and half-truth, I think you should really read the Wikipedia No Original Research policy. Edits based on your own ideas are really not acceptable and will be deleted (unless you've had them published in reliable publications that you can reference). Rlitwin 13:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dictionary

As a matter of policy, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. As you know, the Wikimedia project already has a dictionary, Wiktionary. Gazpacho 22:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] USENET

I sympathise with your frustration at not being able to communicate your message to the world, but Wikipedia is not the place to publish original research. If you are unable to have your ideas published in academic papers, or popular magazines, you may like to consider USENET.

USENET is easily available through Google Groups. While Wikipedia is an on-line encyclopedia that anyone can edit, USENET is an on-line news and discussion system that anyone can post to. Material posted to USENET is archived by Google and, once archived, no-one can delete your words.

Be warned however, USENET is a threaded discussion format. People can post replies to your article, question your ideas and attack you personally. If you post your ideas to USENET be prepared to defend them because they will be mercilessly attacked.

It is also important to choose an appropriate newsgroup in which to post your ideas. If you choose the wrong newsgroup your ideas will either be ignored, or replies will ignore the ideas and criticise your poor choice of newsgroup. Think of it as a news stand of magazines, each with their own target audience. An article about bodybuilding techniques would not look right in a magazine about crochet and knitting. Your ideas would not be well received in rec.aquaria, but they may be better received in alt.philosophy.

I also suggest you take time to read some of the articles in your chosen newsgroup, preferably for a week or so, before posting an article of your own. This will allow you to get a feel for the style of the newsgroup, and the kind of responses you might evoke. USENET is not for everyone, but it may be the publishing media you have been looking for. --Dave 09:57, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the info...

You might consider a page, about discoveries that no one realy wants to print...conflict of intersts...but that would benefit people...cancer cures, etc...

I have been posting these discoveries since about 1998 in the newsgroups.

Most of the 'others' do not find it politically acceptable to print these politically unacceptable truths.

Some because the material confirms the message of Jesus Christ, others because it offends their hidden political agenda that appears to be 'vindictive' rather than based on justice and compassion.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:35, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] IBS

Hi Caesarjbsquitti,

You posted the message below on Talk:Irritable bowel syndrome. However, you don't make any suggestions about the article, so I think you're violating Wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Please use talk pages to discuss the making of articles. Also, please sign your name. Feel free to add to the article itself.

grtz,

--Steven Fruitsmaak | Talk 14:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

I've reverted again. Please discuss, I have no intention to get into an edit war. Also, trie to add new comments at the bottom of a talk page, or better yet use the " + "-tab to automatically add a comment.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Talk) 11:26, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Overlooked cause: Bacteria

While the logic of the symptoms suggest a 'infection' of some sorts, it becomes clear that IBS, and Crohns will follow the history of ulcers.

BACTERIA MAY BE THE CAUSE OF IBS

My suggestion look up herbal cures for parasites.

If a corporation who is concerned about bottom line profits is willing to sell you cigarettes that will kill you, do you not think a corporation who is concerned about bottom line profits is willing to sell you tests, and superficial treatments that help but not cure you from a disease that creates the demand for their tests, and superficial treatments ?

--Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:46, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] George Petralia

I moved your article to George Petralia. Please don't keep recreating it under the name How to create an article. Thanks, NawlinWiki 05:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Finally read your message....excuse the slip up, too late, too tired. Thanks !

[edit] License tagging for Image:Roy Piovesana.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Roy Piovesana.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:09, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Don Grashey

Can you please add the year of his death, not just his age? Thanks.

[edit] Image:Roy_Piovesana.JPG listed for deletion

[edit] Comments on Talk:Devil

I've removed your comments from Talk:Devil. Again, Wikipedia is not a forum to promote your original research. I suggest you may want to publish your findings in reputable magazines or peer-reviewed journals, or set up a website and (when it becomes notable) later others will link it appropriately in articles. Until then, please help contribute to improving the factual information on articles here. -- Kesh 04:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

It appears most magazines or peer-reveiwed journals are part of the stone walling these new ideas.

I have an online website to expose these discoveries, with some reference to Oxford's acceptance of some of the suggestions regarding half-truths.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:37, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hello anyone else here ?

I seem to have made quite a few changes without a comment...is anyone else here ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Preview

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Geniac 20:49, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Regrets on that one...sometimes I forget...as I just did...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 15:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I know, I know...use the sandbox...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 00:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] About some of your edits

Hello Caesarjbsquitti,

Since you asked for comments on the talk page of half-truths, I will do my best to give you some that, I hope, might be helpful. Note that I am not the editor who removed your recent additions to that page, calling them a "peeve", even though I probably would have done so if I had seen them first (though I would have tried to use a less harsh language).

Firstly, your example about Galilleo going through hell to prove his point is of course correct, but it does not apply to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not about proving one's point or giving opinions, however well founded and in good faith. If something has not been published by a reputable source, it should not be on Wikipedia. If Wikipedia had existed in Galilleo's days, his new research, however well founded, would not have been welcome here. Anything for which you cannot find a reliable source, anything that is an opinion, whether yours or someone else's, should be kept out of Wikipedia articles (except if you clearly state who thinks so, and, again, provide a source). Personal experiences, original research and thoughts are of course totally forbidden and will be reverted.

My book, 'The Jesus Christ Code' has not yet been published, and as of yet, many sources are unwilling to print the material, poltiical. I am certain the GAlilleo, also could not find someone to print his material, except himself, and he was taken to task by the 'authorities' of the day.

+++++++++++++

There are different types of opinion. A fact, ie Canada's political system uses two types of electing people, first is uses a first past the post system during the general election, and it uses a multiple run off system for electing party leaders. That is not merely an opinion, that is a fact that is seldom if ever detailed as such. It is my 'original research', yes but more than that.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

++++++++++++++++

About providing sources: not everything that's on the internet counts as a reliable source. The most obvious examples of sources that should not be used are blogs, user-edited sites such as Wiktionary, and promotional websites. For more information about providing reliable sources, you may want to read Wikipedia:Citing sources.

++++++++++

I have just finished changing the material for Loretta Lynn her movie and book are false, or shall we say full of half-truths, or errors of omission.

Sicilian Wood Carver

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

++++++++++

Last but not least, all edits much reflect a neutral point of view, but I trust that you were aware of that.

The examples provided in the half-thruths article therefore violated WP:NOR, as no source could be provided that said "[...] is a half-truth". The ones that you added later, about Canadian politics and such were unnecessarily divisive and controversial, as well as being original research and possible biased, and definitely unverifiable as half-truths.

++++++++++++++++++++

If you see an animal and conclude it is a dear, that is 'your opinion', your research, is it true ?

The Canadian Political system or medical system are full of half-truths, problem is that all people except myself really know what they are. So where is the publications ?

Well you see, medias' have been corrupted for many years, and they do not want to disclose this. Their ability to maintain the decpetion is based on their political ability to control the media forces. Not a conspiracy, merely politics.

Tricky part...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

++++++++++

I am sure that you have much knowledge and insight to share, however Wikipedia is not the place to do so. Only well-established, published facts belong here, whereas opinions, personal research and beliefs belong to blogs. Remember, "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth" (from WP:V).

I hope that these comments will be helpful to you, and that you will keep them in mind when editing. Regards, IronChris | (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

++++++++++++++

It becomes obvious to me that 'the system' can easily be corrupted by those 'that print' research with ulterior motives....ie the cigarette companies and their scientiests...

The sign on the Canadian US border, "IN ONTARIO Wife abuse is a crime" is a half-truth. Can you not understand this, is it research or is it findings that does not need scientific explanation.

I appreciate your feedback...The Jesus Christ Code....coming soon !

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Spousal abuse Noted on www.wikipedia.com, January 27th, 2007 "Spousal abuse is a specific form of domestic violence where physical or sexual abuse is perpetuated by one spouse upon another. The term was coined in the late 1970s once such crimes were given wider attention in society. There are separate legalities and punishments applied to such a crime as opposed to random assault or assaults of another nature (see battered woman defence and battered person syndrome)." Here the corruption of a topic is noted by the manipulation of abuse. Abuse is NOT a specific type fo domestic violence. Here the heading has been corrupted to attack men, because the material is used to highlight statistical manipuation fo violence by men against women, which is only one type of abuse.^[1]

[edit] On half-truths andwholesale WP:OR

Although numerous people have already pointed this out, let me remind you that publishing your own refutation of a source or another Wikipedia article is the very definition of original research and does not belong in Wikipedia articles. Frankly, I'm glad that you think critically about your sources, but if you continue to put your analysis in articles, it will continue to be deleted and you and other editors will get increasingly frustrated with the situation. Please just stop doing this. The best outcome for all would be for you to continue to contribute to WP by inserting information from reliable sources into articles, but discussing your opinions on such sources in a blog or your own website. Cheers, JChap2007 23:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Images.

What types of licensing are acceptable for images.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Carroll Baker Petralia Grasley.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Durin 15:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• You removed the no source tag on the image without providing a source. Please do not remove this tag without providing a source. Thank you, --Durin 16:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Did i not provide the source...George Petralia ? Technical problem ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 21:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:2004tbonlinegregzelinskimayor.JPG

[edit] AfD nomination of Rita Ubriaco

An editor has nominated Rita Ubriaco, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita Ubriaco and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 15:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edits to Child Abuse page

I have reverted the edits you put on the first section of the Child Abuse page as I did not feel they added anything to the text, they were unsubstantiated in regards to the Childrens Aid Society (and even if you can substantiate claims that they have been involved in abuse that information could perhaps go in the Notable Instances of Child Abuse section, not in the introductory paragraph) and did not seem to be NPOV. edchant 04:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I believe the incidents are well referenced, if you would like to move them to an appropriate section, please do. (if I have time I will try myself) But it is not appropriate to merely isolate 'adults', ignoring all the other 'sources' of abuse.

Thanks.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I reverted you again, unfortunately before I saw this discussion. However, I side with Edchant; even if you can argue that there is some substance, this belongs nowhere near the first sentence of the article. Please feel free to add it somewhere appropriate. Clayboy 17:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

I understand your point, and make the following adjustment...less is more sometimes....

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 17:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Joseph Mauro

A tag has been placed on Joseph Mauro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall ^talk 17:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Joseph Mauro was a well recognized writer, producer, etc... in Thunder Bay...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Thunder Bay Sleeping Giant.JPG

Image:Thunder Bay Sleeping Giant.JPG has a nasty watermark identifying it as property of thunderbayonline.com yet you licensed it as PD.

If you are the actual copyright owner, could you please upload a version without a watermark? If you are not, please change the license statement on the image accordingly. --Qyd 13:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

What is the best way of doing that ?

Depends of the actual copyright status. If you just copied the image frpm the mentioned website without permission, the image may not stay on wikipedia, and should be deleted (place a {{db}} tag on the image page). If there are permissions, explain that on the image page. Read Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for more information. --Qyd 15:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fugue (mental state of mind)

A tag has been placed on Fugue (mental state of mind), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --DashaKat 00:13, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

You are correct, but when I entered "fugue" into the search, 'fugue -state of mind' did not show up.

Option here to improve the cross reference ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:30, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Carroll Baker (singer)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. [1] --Ronz 23:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Ronz 23:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

This applies to your links to http://www.squittis.com/ and http://www.thejesuschristcode.com/ --Ronz 23:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

The links are only on my personal information page, is that problem ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

You've added the second to articles and article talk pages. --Ronz 04:09, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The second in 'talk pages' only, is for the purpose of providing you the opportunity of seeing my original research, and hopefully finding something close to it, that you can use for improving the encyclopedia.

You must ask yourself how many of the 'research articles' are original research by individuals who are not at arms length from other corporate entities that serve their purpose, magazines with affiliated sources ?

Anyway, hope it helps....

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:28, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, Wikipedia has a lot of problems with original research. I hope you're not bringing this up as justification for what you have done though. --Ronz 18:16, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 23:06, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] École Polytechnique massacre

I reverted your recent addition to this article, as it seemed to me to be merely your opinion. You said: The political polarization of the incident male verses female is apparent in the simple observation that while all the victims were female, (a half-truth many had fathers, brothers or boyfriends who were also victims of the tragedy, and who were totally ignored. I see no citations for this commentary and I'm not even totally sure what you were trying to say. So I removed it. Dina 16:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

It was a simplistic observation, every woman has a father ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:22, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Giardiasis

I have reverted your edits to Giardiasis because they were copied from http://www.yosemite.org/naturenotes/Giardia.htm. Wikipedia can't take material copied from other sources. Corvus cornix 22:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I believe the original quote was referenced, however the reference did not show up, and was hoping you would correct that problem rather than remove the citing.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Two paragraphs are not a quote, even if they're cited, they're plagiarism. Corvus cornix 23:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I was not aware of that, citing a referenced quote is plagiarism ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

You didn't indicate in the article that it was a quote, nor did you indicate in the article whom you were quoting. You merely copied paragraphs from the source and added a footnote indicating that's where they came from. Corvus cornix 16:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Does not the second assume the first ? Anyway, I will add it in the future, thanks.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 16:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Just for the record, my first posting, used some type of code for reference, perhaps it was the wrong one...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:14, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sir John Magazine Cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir John Magazine Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sir John Magazine.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir John Magazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Green Flag of Canada svg.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Green Flag of Canada svg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I had second thoughts on the image, and was trying to delete it...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 18:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Criteria for biographical articles

Please could you read our biography criteria before adding any more articles about people (apparently, most of them your relatives) to Wikipedia? -- Karada 17:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

We are all related...? If the material is appropriate is the real qustion...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 17:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

That's right. Please read WP:NOTABILITY and WP:RS for more information on the necessary criteria for inclusion. -- Karada 18:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of Bruno Bertucci

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bruno Bertucci, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bruno Bertucci seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bruno Bertucci, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 17:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Kanada...your not related to the individual who posted that remark on my site are you ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 18:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of Squitti's

Well my advisor was right, the world does not care about you.

Why was Squitti's deleted from your encyclopedia ?

There are other jewelery stores on the site, and other businesses.

It would have been nice to acknowledge that the research funded by Squitti's, led to the discovery of anti-truths, some a mutant of the half-truth.

Let time record that this was not an event that the world believed was notable or worth investing in.

They were right, perhaps I should have minded my own business....

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 18:36, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see the criteria for inclusion of companies on Wikipedia, as well as the original research policy, which appears to apply to your research on "anti-truth". -- Karada 12:36, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Straw puppet terrorists ?

I have noted a similar heading on another thread.

Have you any examples of such 'terrorists' in the world of information and wikipedia ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:22, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Squitti coat of arms.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Squitti coat of arms.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:03, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User page images stating (c)

I've removed the "(c)" from teh captions of 2 images on your user page. Firstly images stored in wikipedia can not be claimed to have copyright to a user as they, like all material at wikipedia, is released on GNU free license or equivalent (see GFDL and relevant image license details). Secondly the image of the prism light-split is originally from NASA according to the image file. You may of course have meant to imply that it is your works that the images attempt to illustrate that are copyrighted, but that was not clear from using the (c) within the image captions. David Ruben ^Talk 21:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the part of that about not being able to claim copyright is slightly misleading. All non-public domain writings and images in Wikipedia are copyrighted by their creators at the time of their creation; that's a basic consequence of copyright law. However, they must also necessarily be licensed under the GFDL by their copyright holder at upload time, something which is only possible because they are copyrighted in the first place, otherwise the license would be meaningless. If you are not the copyright owner of a piece of material, you must not assert that you are the copyright owner.

David is correct in referring to the policy that authors of Wikipedia content do not claim attribution or copyright within the body text of articles: their contribution of written material is, however, clearly attributed in the history logs for each article, and the copyright status of their images is clearly attributed in the image pages which are easily accessible by clicking on the images themselves. -- Karada 08:08, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Speaking of half-truths, the copyright was not in reference to the pictures, even though the copyright symbol was under the picture, the copyright referred to the name, "The Jesus Christ Code. © ", and "The LIGHT: The Rainbow of Truth © "

Thanks for the information.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 14:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Block notification

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 4 days in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for soapboxing, POV pushing, and flamebaiting. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Evidence of this editing problem is available here. Please discuss with me, or obtain a consensus at that thread before unblocking. - Jehochman ^Talk 15:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities and equal rights for women.

I see that you have made the corrections to the definition.

As the author of many of the subclassifications of "feminmism" it was quite frustrating to see obvious errors in the encylopedia, and to have changes reversed by individuals who appear to lack the insight. So I used the 'sandbox', where changes where discussion is to be brought forward.

By the corrections to the obvious entry line to feminism, I see that my concerns were finally addressed.

You must excuse me, I do not really have the time to research who the other posters are, and what is their agenda, or training.

Feminism, or should I say the lack of understanding the good and more importantly the evil side to this movement has no doubt impacted most people in contemporary society, and we should not support such a movement by saying statements that are misleading.

Anyway, no need to unblock me.

Its always good to see who and what actions were carried out by whom and justify their actions. Were they provoking ? Were they uninformed ?

Finally glad to see the corrections to the listing.

Remember even if the allegations presented are totally true, they may be in fact half-truths, deceptive lies, because they omit important truths.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:33, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities and equal rights for women.

Perhaps someone with more ability should check the above statement, it can be misunderstood, should be

Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities against women, and equal rights for women.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Having researched 'feminism' for some 20 years, some individuals who are supportive of the movement seem quite defensive in exposing the truth of this matter, and will go to extreme lengths.

Example: "Stop violence against women" is based on the half-truth "Most violence is by men against women"

False black and white logic that is defended and any attempts to correct this will be met with stiff resisitence.

All I suggest is "STop the abuse of people' which some find offensive ?

Is there a term for this ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:42, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Okay...how do I get some of the listings about 'Squitti Nicola' back on Wikipedia. Information about him were gathered from a book "Nobility of Italy' ...

Thanks

--216.211.15.123 (talk) 01:59, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Odd I went into the page logged in by my computer...?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 02:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Half-truth

An editor has nominated Half-truth, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Half-truth (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] soapboxing

No soapboxing, please. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Use the talk pages to recommend specific changes or issues with the encyclopedia article in question. Please do not use it to discuss your "original research"; that's specifically prohibited by Wikipedia's "No original research" policy. Your comments on Talk:Censorship do not appear aimed at helping to write or edit an encyclopedia article on censorship. --Lquilter (talk) 17:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. It is indeed aimed at suggesting the many 'political' directives that create the many faces of 'censorship' within society. It is a suggestion, an opinion, like many others; the idea was included in the 'talk' section for that specific purpose.

On the point of my 'original research', I was bringing to your attention, the reality that no 'reliable source' that wikipedia accepts is willing to accept it, and thereby is a possible form of intellectual censorship. For example, a trade magazine on 'health care' had its entire staff resign, because they could not 'report' the truths, the negative truths about some drugs, because of 'conflicts of interest'.

This criticism of my "soapboxing" follows the inclusion of 'half-truth' in the 'truth' section of wikipedia. I am now going to follow up to see if it was removed and why. Seems 'this negative' side to truth, something confirmed by Dr. Whitehead, is not somepeople want other peole to know about; Food for thought.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 23:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC) (added later)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Foggy brain

A tag has been placed on Foggy brain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] "wiki-stalking"

"wiki-stalking" 

I recall that when I posted certain politcally incorrect comments on how some individuals had corrupted social programs on spousal abuse to polarize the family, and the sexes, that some individuals who were possibly a party to this would 'stalk' my postings to delete them using whatever truths they could. --Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC) So my concern is that wikipedia be aware of this, and how this gate keeping can censor certain ideas or people.

The greatness of wikipedia will be to allow 'comments' to be listed as long as they are truthful to themselves and of themselves, if it is a rumor, if it is speculation, if it is unfouonded or substantiated by some select these truths should be so noted.

Suggest a criticism section on every topic from the Catholic Church to Feminism, to beyond...and perhaps a rating, on the concern relative to the year and place....?

Remember nothing is perfect so don't be so defensive.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 19:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] POV Warning

You have recently edited Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks in a manner that transgresses the arbitration decision reached. Please do not add disruptive information or comments related to the promotion of conspiracy theories to the September 11, 2001 attacks article or its talk page. Your suggestions are not supported by any credible sources. Continuation of this behavior will result in the imposition of discretionary sanctions that include being banned from editing this article or being blocked entirely for a short period of time. Please refrain from repeating these actions again. Thank you.

[edit] May 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've already been warned you about general 9/11 discussions in the talk page. VegitaU (talk) 03:14, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Taliban Drug Connection Terroist link

Somehow a previous link has not shown up, but here is another.

Some truths no one wants printed ?

Seems someone is racing to ban me before i get a chance to respond.

Also noted was that a PBS report, or other claimed that Alquida was a creation of the whitehouse...

So let us find that link...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

"This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You've already been warned you about general 9/11 discussions in the talk page."

Interesting response.

I tried to place a link that verified my statement, confirming my observation that the entry lacked any referenct to drugs, and now this final 'stone walling'?

I would wikipedia takes a close look at this before I am banned forever, and not allowed to defend myself...

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:19, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

"VegitaU posted: Taliban had stopped opium growth before 9/11."

Later on I found a link substantiating the connection.

However by then VegitaU had given me a final threat of banning me from wikipedia.

I did not have a chance to post my respond to the shortcomings of the article. The drug connection.

Anyway, I don't like the treatment I received in this matter, and hope Wikipedia will examine this evidence.

VeitaU then posts. " What does that have to do with anything 9/11 related? -- VegitaU (talk) 03:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC) "

Is it not obious. VegitaU makes the claim that the Taliban stopped producing Opium. Oh really ?

They still are.

"I have to say I've never heard this one before. And since the Taliban had stopped opium growth before 9/11, no, it's not possible. -- VegitaU (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

I too am surprised not to have heard of it before now. Do you have a reliable source for this, or is it just conjecture? We can't just add any editor's opinion to an article. Wikipedia policy forbids it. SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 19:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

This isn't a discussion forum. If you don't feel the motives given by Al-Qaeda are logical, then that's your opinion — they clearly disagree. Nonetheless, this isn't a place to discuss which motives are, or are not, logical. Please confine your comments to the article, and not the subject. --Haemo (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Taliban Drug Connection Terroist link

Somehow a previous link has not shown up, but here is another.

Some truths no one wants printed ?

• (there was reference here to a PBS documentary that said "Al-Quida" was created by the Whitehouse. (PBS documentary that aired some 2 months ago) My posting of this comment did not show up on the talk page.

"What does that have to do with anything 9/11 related? -- VegitaU (talk) 03:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:September_11%2C_2001_attacks"

I think we have a problem here ! I let me post this before I, my posts, become victims of another "politically corrector"

What are talk pages all about anyway. I suggested there was a flaw with the page, and later found it.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 03:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

So I was wrong about the Taliban. Big whoop. I'm an editor on the 9/11 attacks article and you have failed to show me one bit of evidence about the Taliban's policies toward opium having anything to do with the attacks. Show me some evidence that America's war on drugs inspired the attacks or was even a motivator for bin Laden. -- VegitaU (talk) 03:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

The links speak for themselves, if they are reliable. My suggestion, was that the article missed the most obvious, and a link was found. Why are you so defensive ?

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 04:00, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

What links? All I see is a congressional discussion after 9/11 about the Taliban's policy on opium. -- VegitaU (talk) 04:08, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

The movie is 'Clear and Present Danger ?" Its about a 'covert' CIA operation aimed at drug lords in Columbia using the Air Force...?

To: VegitaU

No disrespect to the American Military, I had two cousins lose their lives as US Marines in the 2nd world war, and some of my cousins are in the middle east, with the US Military. Let's not polarize the issue or take it personal.

Being involved in 'organizations' I have learned that the 'actual philosophy' of the organization can change depending on who is in power and their purposes, be they obvious or hidden.

The truth is out there somewhere, and who knows if we will ever find it.

As Cain said to God, "Am I my brothers keeper"....teh question asked by God, was "where is your brother'...(God knew the answer and Cain deflected the question with a question that hid what God knew; He was his brothers killer !

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 13:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Terrorists are a half-truth: It may be an Opium war.

[edit] Terrorists are a half-truth: It may be an Opium war.

You wanted links, some people don't want these ones....? - - Terrorists are a half-truth: It may be an Opium war. - Since the initial 9-11 and 'the war on terrorism' certain facts come to mind. - - This may in fact be an Opium war. - - I will add more links as I find them. - - Opium War not a war on terrorists - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - BBC report - - BBC Report - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - B.B. Report. - BBC REPORT - - The problem of Opium seems to be the problem attached to 'the Taliban'...the word lacks definition. - - BBC Reports on Opium War Possibility - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - - As a result, in 1974 the Turks, with American and U.N. support, tried a different tactic. They began licensing poppy cultivation for the purpose of producing morphine, codeine and other legal opiates. Legal factories were built to replace the illegal ones. Farmers registered to grow poppies, and they paid taxes. You wouldn't necessarily know this from the latest White House drug strategy report-- which devotes several pages to Afghanistan but doesn't mention Turkey -- but the U.S. government still supports the Turkish program, even requiring U.S. drug companies to purchase 80 percent of what the legal documents euphemistically refer to as "narcotic raw materials" from the two traditional producers, Turkey and India. - - You wouldn't necessarily know this from the latest White House drug strategy report-- - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 20:37, 24 May 2008 (UTC) - - I did manage to find this on an older screen, please advise if this is correct, and who and why was this removed ? - - --Caesar J. B. Squitti : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 02:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Topic ban

From all the evidence here on your talkpage, edits, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Arbitration_enforcement#User:Caesarjbsquitti_and_unsourced_POV, and input from other admins, you are banned from all 9/11 articles and their talk pages. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The original 'talk' input about the total lack of an 'opium/drug' was a comment.

As soon as I posted this, I was sent a notice that I would be banned.

Within minutes, I was able to find several sources that suggested an opium/drug source, however I was being 'stone walled' about them.

In fact the 'editor' that presented me with the cease or be censored was an individual who based on his military background should have suggested or known about this.

Anway, I will post the links I have found, and perhaps you can determine why this information is not being included in this section or the conspiracy thought section of the site.

Thanks

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 14:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Sexism: Apparent non-neutral point of view, (WP:NPOV) and original research WP:OR

Hello. I noticed you re-included a paragraph in the sexism article. As I explained in the edit summary of my reversion of this material, the long paragraph illustrating an instance of perceived sexism against males is inappropriate in a general "sexism against males" section. The goal of the section is to explain what sexism against males is and what forms it may take, not to list incidents. On that basis, I believe the paragraph is to be removed. The information may be relevant to other articles, perhaps Violence against women.

I'd also like to note that the paragraph contains apparently non-neutral, and non-verified statements that appear to be your personal opinion ("The response shows how generalized, selective half-truth logic has been used to rationlize sexist theory"). It also gets the year wrong at the beginning ("In 1987..."). Just a note to be more careful on that. Blackworm (talk) 21:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, I will try it there.

You had explained that the 'date' was missing. So I added it in.

"what forms it may take, not to list incidents" Are they not the same, as in the incident reveals the 'social advertising' dealing with 'violence.'

My observation, and there are many observations of the material tries to explain the decpetion.

Anyway, food for thought...

Yes the year was 1997, (but I have been spending hours on my computer trying to get my Kapersky Anti-Virus back working, it appears the upgrades to the program corrupted the abilty for it to work, and I had to upgrade the program. I have been busy.

Anyway something for you to consider.

Again thanks for the suggestion.

--Caesar J. B. Squitti  : Son of Maryann Rosso and Arthur Natale Squitti 22:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)