Talk:Caesars Palace
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Caesars Palace is part of WikiProject Gambling, an attempt at building a useful gambling resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information). |
 |
This article is part of Wikiproject Las Vegas, a collective effort to improve articles relating to Greater Las Vegas (Nevada). If you would like to join us, visit our project page. For discussions that may cover more than one article, see our project talk page. |
Frank Sinatra as most notable act?
What makes Frank Sinatra the "most notable" act appearing at Caesars Palace? Is there a famous or pop culture link (that I am not aware of) between Frank Sinatra and Caesars Palace that makes this an objective analysis?- -HobbesLeviathan (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Ten Billion Dollars? In 1962? Who wrote this nonsense?
A trillion dollars? The entire GDP of the USA in 2006 was 13 trillion. Can someone fix this stupidity? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.195.255.172 (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
That would be vandalism; I reverted it 75.166.54.155 01:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
why isn't it Caesar's Palace? Or even Caesars' Palace, if referring to all of the Caesars? Why no apostrophe? Saccerzd 12:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
edit: I'v ejust read in the article that "it is called caesars and not caesar's because every guest is a caesar". Surely, then, it should have been called caesars' palace? Saccerzd 12:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
the first picture is a shot of Caesars Augustus Tower, but the foreground is Bellagio, next door and accross Flamingo Road. It could be misleading.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Caesarslogo.gif
Image:Caesarslogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit warring re: blackjack criticism
I again reverted the contested, unsourced, pov statements. In my opinion, a {{fact}} is not enough here because the statements made in the edit have not only been contested and are unsourced, but by consensus felt to be a non-neutral pov in this and other articles previously. Also, please note that the source that was provided in a recent edit have nothing to do with the critical opinion(s) it was attached to. --SesameballTalk 20:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
