Talk:Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale. |
Прем'єр-міністр України Юлія Тиимошенко представила свій уряд
Перший віце-прем'єр-міністр- Анатолій Кінах.
Віце-прем'єр з євроінтеграції - Олег Рибачук.
Віце-прем'єр з гуманітарних питань - Микола Томенко.
Віце прем'єр з адміністративної реформи - Роман Безсмертний.
Міністр аграрної політики - Олександр Бранівський.
Міністр внутрішніх справ – Юрій Луценко.
Міністр економіки - Сергій Тєрьохін.
Міністр закордонних справ - Тарасюк Борис.
Міністр культури – Оксана Білозір.
Міністр оборони – Анатолій Гриценко.
Міністр освіти і науки - Станіслав Ніколаєнко.
Міністр охорони здоров'я - Поліщук Микола.
Міністр охорони навколишнього середовища - Ігнатенко Павло.
Міністр палива та енергетики - Плачков Сергій.
Міпраці та соціальної політики- Кириленко Вячеслав.
Міністр промислової політики - Шандра Володимир.
Міністр транспорту – Євген Червоненко.
Міністр у спрвах сімї і молоді - Юрій Павленко.
Міністр фінансів – Віктор Пинзеник.
Міністр надзвичайних ситуацій - Давид Жванія.
Міністр юстиції – Роман Зварич.
Головою СБУ Ющенко призначив Олександра Турчинова.
Голови обласних адміністрацій:
Вінницька - Добровський Олександр
Волинська – Бондар Володимир
Дніпропетровська – Касьянов Сергій
Донецька – Чупрун Вадим
Житомирська – Жебрівський Павло
Закарпатська – Балога Віктор
Запорізька – Артеменко Юрій
Івано-Франківська - Ткач Роман
Київська - Жовтяк Євген
Кіровоградська – Джейнаров Едуард
Луганська – Данилов Олексій
Львівська - Олійник Петро
Миколаївська – Садиков Олександр
Полтавська - Бульба Степан
Рівненська – Червоній Василь
Одеська – Сушко Василь
Сумська – Лаврик Микола
Тернопільська - Стойко Іван
Харківська – Аваков Арсен
Херсонська – Силенков Борис
Хмельницька – Віталій Олуйко
Черкаська - Черевко Олександр
Чернівецька - Ткач Микола
Чернігівська - Атрощенко Владислав
м. Київ – Омельченко Олександр
м. Севастополь – Іванов Сергій
[edit] Bios
For bios of most of the new cabinet members, see: http://www2.pravda.com.ua/en/ http://www.mirror-weekly.com/nn/index/532/
—206.231.91.2 22:17, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
[edit] List as of Feb. 4, 2005
Prime Minister Yuliya Tymoshenko
First Vice Prime Minister Anatoliy Kinakh
Vice Prime Minister on Eurointegration Oleh Rybachuk
Vice Prime Minister on Humanitarian Policy Mykola Tomenko
Vice Prime Minister on Territorial Administrative Reform Roman Bezsmertnyy
Minister of Agrarian Policy Oleksandr Baranivskyy
Minister of Internal Affairs Yuriy Lutsenko
Minister of Economy and European Integration Serhiy Teryokhin
Minister of Foreign Affairs Borys Tarasyuk
Minister of Culture and Arts Oksana Bilozir
Minister of Defense Anatoliy Grytsenko
Minister of Education and Science Stanislav Nikolayenko
Minister of Health Mykola Polishchuk
Minister of Environmental Protection Pavlo Ihnatenko
Minister of Fuel and Energy Ivan Plachkov
Minister of Labor and Social Policy Vyacheslav Kyrylenko
Minister of Industrial Policy Volodymyr Shandra
Minister of Transportation and Communication Evhen Chervonenko
Minister of Family, Children, and Youth Yuriy Pavlenko
Minister of Finance Viktor Pynzenyk
Minister of Emergencies and Affairs of Population Protection from Consequences of Chornobyl Catastrophe David Zhvania
Minister of Justice Roman Zvarych
[edit] Criteria for personal pages needed
People, I think we should work out the criteria for internallinking of the Ukrainian politicians, i.e. for starting their personal pages. Do we really need Kryvobokov, Shandra and Zvarych in the English=global Wikipedia? I mean other nations should not laugh at our egocentric over-reporting. May be we should have few dozens pages for indeed internationally-important people, and a big list fo others? What are the WP guidelines for that?AlexPU
- I cannot subscribe to your opinion. I don't think we should devise any criterion to divide Ukrainian politicians (as well as any other individuals) into those who are "worth" and those who are "not worth". Every person counts, including the last "bomzh".
- Second, I don't care and am rather skeptical that anyone should, in principle, care whether "other nations" laugh or not. I sometimes heard from Ukrainian citizens, "We, Ukrainians, are a modest nation. We won't publicize Holodomor." Forget about it! We, as a dying out and relatively small nation, are playing a complicated survival game in the world economy and politics. Information aspect must be an integral part of the survival strategy.
- Modesty is suicide. No one would care unless we literally make them care. Take the example of Holocaust. We must seriously study and follow the clever and praiseworthy information strategy of the Jewish nation. Orange revolution is an opportunity that happens once in a century. Either exploit its potential, or die.
- Sashazlv 16:13, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
-
- Quite reasonable notes, Sasha. My new idea is to put such important/unimportant lists on the talk pages instead of articles. I mean we're extremely short of qualified contributors (like you) so we should somehow guide their efforts to the priority persons. E.g., somebody did Kryvobokov, but nobody actually mentioned Cassette Scandal on Moroz' page. Давайте сили не розпорошувати? Such priority lists may be a part of a special Wikiproject concentrating on Ukrainian politics. The extreme way of setting the priorities is the confidential e-mail briefings. Pryvit, AlexPU
- Makes sense. Just compile the list of priorities to get an idea what needs to be done. Do you know whether there is a way to get how many users viewed a given page in Wikipedia? I examined their statistics page and there is nothing similar to that (or, at least, I couldn't find it). Maybe, it's just too resource consuming to track every single page. However, given the deficit of contributors, I wouldn't want to spend a lot of time expanding the Constitution of Ukraine page if hardly anyone views it. Sashazlv 00:20, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Quite reasonable notes, Sasha. My new idea is to put such important/unimportant lists on the talk pages instead of articles. I mean we're extremely short of qualified contributors (like you) so we should somehow guide their efforts to the priority persons. E.g., somebody did Kryvobokov, but nobody actually mentioned Cassette Scandal on Moroz' page. Давайте сили не розпорошувати? Such priority lists may be a part of a special Wikiproject concentrating on Ukrainian politics. The extreme way of setting the priorities is the confidential e-mail briefings. Pryvit, AlexPU
Moving criteria discussion to Talk:Category:Ukrainian politicians.
As for the statistics, Sasha, you've got it! That is what I always wanted to know! As a politics related guy, I'm used to rely on some kind of polls in addition to my intuition. Such view counters would significantly optimize the efforts of the systematic writers like us. I mean I could write hundreds of articles (mostly factual and not only Ukraine-related) if I freaking had enough time. Knowing readers demand would ease the choice dramatically! We should raise this question on the highest Wiki level. So people, on what page do you think we can do it? Michael?
About the Constitution, I think the politics-oriented overview would be the best decision for now. Best wishes, AlexPU
- I suspect that statistics aren't available in Wikipedia at least partly by design. I think it's desirable that people work on articles that they think are significant, and won't be dissuaded because the subject will get only .0000001 percent of the hits.
- I wouldn't purposely omit any politicians. It's okay to leave red-linked names, and maybe someone else will start an article. Tiny stubs are fine, too, even if they just identify the subject in one sentence. Sometimes that's all someone needs to know when they type the name into the search box. It's all encyclopedic, and it may be significant to someone in a different context from us (e.g., someone studying local politics of the Piddupka raion centre).
