User talk:C56C

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Hovind and accredidation (sp?)

It seemed unnecessary to me to include "non-accredited" on the "one-year" institution. I think that's why it wasn't reinserted when the other two were. I don't object, though. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Even though the one year degree is unusual, some techincal schools that are accredited can give out cerfticates for one years worth of work. It is unaccredited and should be mentioned as such. Maybe I missed the explanation, but do feel it belongs. C56C 16:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] David Vitter RFC

Could you please leave your comments at a Davit Vitter RFC? Thanks. ∴ Therefore | talk 15:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] America 21

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article America 21, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of America 21. Shell ^babelfish 17:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)