User talk:C.Ransom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Helena (High LEvel Net Analyzer)
A tag has been placed on Helena (High LEvel Net Analyzer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CiaranG 16:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Please stop removing the tag from the page. Please also read WP:AUTO and the message above. Thanks. CiaranG 16:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- Please refrain from recreating deleted articles without any kind of discussion beforehand. -- Steel 16:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Note
I have moved your article on your Helena project to a subset of your userpage. It will stay there until you can convince other editors that it merits an article. Got it? DS 16:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- I don't really understand what you need to be conviced. If a list of papers published in several international conferences and a PhD Thesis are not enough, i don't really know what i can do. Can you tell me? Maybe i should notify the reading comitees of all these international conferences that all our papers they found interesting are considered as trivial and/or irrelevant by wikipedia admins. I think they would commit hara-kiri right away. Christophe.Pajault 07:48, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Your project seems to be supported by several papers written by you and your associate. This is not good research; specifically, it amounts to original research. The true notability test for your article is third-party verifiable sources who have reacted to the project and evaluated its merit -- preferrably favorable. Please continue to read up on Wikipedia's policies to make certain that you truly do meet them. - CobaltBlueTony 14:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- So you consider that a reading comitee of an international conference is not reliable? Well, i guess you never tried to submit a paper to any kind of international scientific conference. Some people are using our tool Helena and cite it in their paper Modelling and verification of authentication using enhanced net semantics of SPL (Security Protocol Language) (citation: High Level Petri Nets Analysis with Helena.) but unfortunately, their paper was published in an international conference so i guess you won't consider this source as "reliable". Christophe.Pajault 14:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- This is very confusing to me, as I cannot immediately determine what your article is about, other than a computer program. I recommend finding a Wikipedian who knows enough about this types of stuff, like Matt Britt; alternatively, try explaining this in a way that more Wikipedians will understand (less technical). Happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony 15:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- So you consider that a reading comitee of an international conference is not reliable? Well, i guess you never tried to submit a paper to any kind of international scientific conference. Some people are using our tool Helena and cite it in their paper Modelling and verification of authentication using enhanced net semantics of SPL (Security Protocol Language) (citation: High Level Petri Nets Analysis with Helena.) but unfortunately, their paper was published in an international conference so i guess you won't consider this source as "reliable". Christophe.Pajault 14:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Your project seems to be supported by several papers written by you and your associate. This is not good research; specifically, it amounts to original research. The true notability test for your article is third-party verifiable sources who have reacted to the project and evaluated its merit -- preferrably favorable. Please continue to read up on Wikipedia's policies to make certain that you truly do meet them. - CobaltBlueTony 14:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
