User talk:C.Kent87

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!

Dear C.Kent87: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Wikipedians try to follow a strict policy of never biting new users. If you are unsure of how to do something, you are welcome to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator. One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD!

Posted by User: Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 02:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barbara Eden

Apologies. Was an edit/conflict revert. You edited the article just two minutes before I did, and because I was systematically removing spam from a number of articles, your edit got caught in the crossfire. Funnily enough, the same thing almost happened again just now when I tried to fix the previous error. --Chris Griswold (☎☓) 02:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mexico

I really don't know what you're talking about. I honestly don't remember doing such a thing. Can you please show me where I did what you say? Perhaps I did it, but again, I honestly don't remember. AlexCovarrubias ( Let's talk! ) 21:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind, I just checked and the one who did it was User:Mixcoatl. It was not me. It sounded wierd to me because I don't usually edit history related subarticles. However, if you want to keep that information without other users erasing it, just add a source. AlexCovarrubias ( Let's talk! ) 21:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Winterhalter

My apologies for moving the portrait of Portrait of Maximilian I of Mexico that you added to the article of Franz Xaver Winterhalter that I wrote. I moved that portrait, which studing Winterhalter wok, I have to confess I never saw before, different reasons. 1. Winterhalter is remembered for his portraits of royalty particularly his female sitters. noone of the portraits he painted of men his famous or rank among his best. The best known is perhaps the ones he painted of Prince Albert, secondly the ones of Napoleon III or king Lous Philippe of France. so the portrait of Maximilian I of Mexico is of no consequence among Winterhalter's work. 2.There is limited space within the article to display the paintings of Winterhalter, therefore the ones shown are only his most important and famous ones with the sole exception of his selfportrait with his brother, display to show his resemblance.The other four :Portrait of Elisabeth of Bavaria, Empress of Austria, The Empress Eugénie Surrounded by her Ladies in Waiting,Portrait of Madame Barbe de Rimsky-Korsakov and Portrait of Leonilla Bariatinskaia Princess of Sayn Wittgenstein Say are Winterhalter's best. 3.There is a place for lesser and all the other Winterhalter's paintings: Wikimedia Commons media related to him. I hope you understand my reasons. I am happy with your collaboration and interest. Check the other articles I have created, perhaps you can alos help with them. Let's work together and move on regards,User_talk:Miguelemejia

[edit] Chile

You might want to check out this and this. Khoikhoi 06:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess it's because I edit a lot of Turkey-related articles. Are most Chileans mestizo in appearance? I know that most Argentinians tend to look more European, sí? :-) I don't know much about Filipinos, sorry. Maybe my friend Tombseye might know, you could try asking him. Khoikhoi 05:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Please check the edit history of the page before editing next time. CieloEstrellado made a destructive edit, essentially reverting to a version of the article from months before. Thanks, Khoikhoi 03:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I was talking about this edit. You made your edit under that version. Khoikhoi 03:28, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Filipino People article

Thank you for helping with the article...those guys are too much! Why do Filipinos want to be associated with Hispanics so badly? I don't know... oh, do you think you can tell me how to sign my name so ther'll be a link? Mine haven't been doing that...???? I just put four tildes..that's all it says to do. Thank You ; ] Cali567 04:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, I figured it out...thanks! Cali567 05:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

Saber girl08 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.


Saber girl08 19:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MEXICO IS MESTIZO , CHILE NO

the SOURCE THAT YOU USE IS CUSTIONABLE, I I HAVE FOUR SOURCES OF GREATER QUALITY THAN THEY SAY THAT MOST OF the CHILEAN POBLACION IS SPANIARD

My sources:


1,. THE WORLD VALUES WORLD CHILE 2006 [[1]]

2.- SPAIN GOV. [[2]]

3.- CIA [[3]]

Antarcticwik 00:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Antarcticwik

Blancos are 61% in the 1st reference. Why do you ignore it? Blanco means white, according to Antarcticwik.Ayasi 19:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] White American

When I reverted your changes I wrote, " please explain on the talk page why this is pov if you'd like to remove it. this has been subject to ongoing discussion/editing." You reverted it back without explaining on the talk page. I'll leave it with your version for now but if you don't respond to justify the changes on the talk page I'll revert back. Thanks in advance for your input. Calliopejen1 08:51, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Oops, never mind, I can't read right. I see that you left it. Thanks, and I'm in the process of adding references for it. Calliopejen1 08:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry..

Hi C.Kent87, just thought you'd like to know that you're under sockpuppetry suspicion...by User:Ramirez72...He'll be "monitoring" whatever you're doing...weirdo..huh...thought I'd let you know. Cali567 04:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the warning, but I have done nothing wrong but make very few edits. We can all go on to our lives without scare, Ramirez seems to be an honest fellow, so this will all blow over soon enough. Thank You C.Kent87 19:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Original Synthesis

"Many of the 49%[citation needed] of Mexican Americans who identified as white in the 2000 Cesus would likely fit into this category, particularly since only 10% of the population of Mexico is white."

Just to let you know, this section should not have been deleted. It should have been tagged as original synthesis. Remember It is always better to add to an article than to subtract from it. Have a good day. Jerome709 (talk) 05:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

You may be right, but unless you have a source to back this up, you shouldn't delete this information. Tag it with an accuracy warning. Jerome709 (talk) 05:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: CIA facts..

Please see this diff. You were the one who deleted User:SamEV's contribution in which he re-added the CIA percentages. Now, please take a look at my contribution, i undid your edit because you were the one who removed them. Also, what do black Cubans have to do with the article? I hope next time you read things more carefully. -- LaNicoya  •Talk•  22:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. But, if black Cubans have nothing to do with this matter, don't mention them. The article is about White Latin Americans so i truly had no idea why you mentioned black Cubans. Hopefully this little incident will help you use the "preview" button and re-check what you ar doing. Either way, case closed. Have a nice day =) and a future merry Christmas.-- LaNicoya  •Talk•  23:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)