User talk:C0pernicus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello C0pernicus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- KHM03 14:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

wow i just came across an article of yours, and i must say for a newcomer the writing and npov where excellent!, keep up the good work!Benon 16:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

thefore you deserve this

Exceptional Newcomer Award

The Exceptional Newcomer Award boldness beyond their experience.Benon 16:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Moken

In the Moken article you removed the lines ==Reference== <reference />. These lines pull the citations down from the text where they nest next to the individual items. It may look as though the section is empty, but it isn't. Please do let me know if you have any questions about these lines, or if you had another reason for removing them. Thanks. Bejnar 22:05, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

No I didn't! I moved them further down. You haven't restored them, you've duplicated them. If you list the references at that point in the article you miss any citations that appear later. There's one in the section 'to be verified'. C0pernicus 20:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, I didn't see them. I have removed the unverified material and there is now only one set of References. Bejnar 15:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chaps

For what it's worth, there is a poll re the chaps, shaps question, here: Talk:Chaps#Polling. --Una Smith (talk) 05:06, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

[edit] Request for mediation

Hi C0pernicus, I've added your name to the formal request for mediation on Chaps due to your earlier request on the article's talk page. If you want to participate, then just "agree" to the mediation, if you do not agree, then the request will be denied. I think it's a good step, and one I was going to suggest, since some of the parties were unhappy with how things were going. I'm not a "professional" mediator, just trying to help out.... Dreadstar † 21:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

C0pernicus, I am the "filing party" on the request for mediation and I did not include you in the list of involved parties because as far as I am concerned you are not involved in the content dispute. However, you are welcome to participate. You have 3 options: remove yourself from the list, agree to the mediation, or do nothing. If you do nothing, my request for mediation might be denied, but under the circumstances I think it would suffice for someone else to remove you from the list. --Una Smith (talk) 22:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Request for mediation accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Chaps.
For the Mediation Committee, WjBscribe 03:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

[edit] MedCom Case

Hi, I'm Keilana. I've just accepted the aforementioned MedCom case. I've commented on the Mediation talk page, where mediation will take place. I hope that this mediation will be productive and satisfactory to all. I have asked all participants to make a statement, more details are on the talk page. Regards, Keilana|Parlez ici 03:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)