Talk:Cơm tấm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality, if possible.
Wikipedians in Vietnam may be able to help!

[edit] Article should explain "broken rice"

I came here looking for an explanation of "broken rice". But the article doesn't explain that, and contains a link to "broken rice" which redirects back here. I wish someone who knows about broken rice would fix that. Thanks. -- 72.92.8.130 23:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. Hopefully that clears it up. DHN 00:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Very True. Com Tam means broken rice. It doesn't matter what is served with it. Com Tam or "broken rice" is half a grain of rice.

[edit] Origin of the fractured grains

I heard from a Vietnamese friend that the broken rice grains aren't browkn purposely, but are in fact a substandard byproduct of the rice polishing process; a certain number of grains will be fractured "rejects," formerly thrown away, fed to animals, or sold to poor people. But in the late 20th century (?), Vietnamese figured out a way to make the food desirable and thus eliminate waste, getting a good price by creating such dishes. If this is correct, it should definitely be added to the article. Badagnani (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)