Talk:César Vallejo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

	Peru Portal This article is supported by the Peru WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
NB: Assessment ratings and other indicators given below are used by the Project in prioritizing and managing its workload.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article needs an infobox to be added.
	This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Peru To-do: edit  Assess and prioritise articles (log) Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate Create: Wildife of Peru, Fauna of Peru, Jorge Eduardo Eielson, Alberto Flores Galindo, Morococha Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Mario Vargas Llosa GAC: Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Additional information: Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. Feel free to make short comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Top This article has been rated as Top-Importance on the assessment scale.

[edit] Linkspam

ShelfSkewed has deleted three external links with the comment:

"rm linkspam and 2 other junky links"

The WikiProject Spam has listed twenty criteria for identifying linkspam:

• 1. User is anonymous (an IP address)
• 2. User:page and/or User_talk:page are red links
• 3. No edit summary (other than, perhaps /* External links */)
• 4. User has made only one edit, which consisted of inserting a link
• 5. User has made multiple edits to related articles
• 6. The majority of user's edits are to external links sections
• 7. The link is a site that has Google/Yahoo ads (AdSense/SM).
• 8. Edits are marked "minor"
• 9. Link is trying to sell a product or service. You can use Microsoft's Detecting Online Commercial Intention Tool to help you with the determination.
• 10. User adds links to the top of a section, above far more relevant sites
• 11. User replaces an existing link or part of an existing link.
• 12. The syntax of the added link does not match the syntax used in the rest of the list
• 13. User adds links to inappropriate sections of articles ("References", "See also", "For more information")
• 14. User adds links that have been previously removed, without discussing on the talk page.
• 15. Following a link takes you to a site that does not mention the specific topic of the page containing the link.
• 16. Link is unrelated, or only marginally related to the article. For example, link on a biography to a specific page on a genealogy site describing the person's genealogy, but not the person.
• 17. User adds links to other Wikipedia articles where he/she has already placed spam links.
• 18. User includes within the link description, "hosted on example.com" with a separate link to example.com.
• 19. Link is mangled, or it took many edits to get the syntax right. The spammer may be new to Wikipedia and not be familiar with Wikipedia syntax for external links.
• 20. Text of the link goes beyond describing the contents to actively encouraging you to read it. For example, including text such as, "Read more about [subject] in [this fascinating article]"

The deleted links do not meet a single one of the criteria for linkspam. However I am deleting one of the links for conflict of interest.Reservoirhill (talk) 14:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)