User talk:C&R

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is C&R's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to C&R.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:C%26R.



Welcome!

Hello, C&R, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Francs2000 13:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)


Thanks C&R 04:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Re: removal of image from your userpage

The image that I removed, Image:Cle.gif, is tagged with a fair use tag. Wikipedia policy as described at Wikipedia:Fair use criteria, prohibits the use of fair use tagged images outside of the main article namespace. Userspace usage of fair use images is not permitted. This is why it was removed from your userpage. If you have further questions about this, I'd be happy to answer. --Durin 22:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)


Thanks C&R 22:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use image removal notification

I've previously removed fair use images from your userspace, and you have raised a concern about it. I've started Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Durin and fair use image removals. You may wish to review and comment. --Durin 13:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism removal

Thanks for getting rid of those rumord on the Lisa Whelchel page.

WAVY 10 14:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

I only saw a massive blanking. I knew nothing about the situation.—Ryūlóng () 04:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


I understand. C&R 04:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

thanks for reverting vandalsum from my page ♥Eternal Pink-ready for love♥ 15:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mistakingly created 64.184.52.109

You probably meant to put that at User Talk:64.184.52.109 and not the article namespace. You stick the warning template on the proper talk page and then stick {{db-author}} on the mistakingly created page to have it nuked.


Yeah, that was a mistake. Thanks for letting me know. C&R 17:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Banning a user

Hey, I'm sure it's already resolved but it's best you take it up with the arbcom, either way, I'm just wondering, what made you come to me? I don't think we've interacted much before. Just curious. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 00:16, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

No, it wasn't a bother, I was just curious since I hadn't seen you edit in any of my regular articles or even seen you on my watchlist. Feel free to ask me for any help you need, no bother at all. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 23:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


Thank you. I appreciate it. C&R 02:32, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Xcryoftheafflictedx

I too have been having problems with User:Xcryoftheafflictedx. He is juvenille, disruptive, ignorant, and generally a detraction to wikipedia. I would support any action regarding sanctioning him. Please let me know if you have initiated anything. AThomas203 01:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


I just now saw this message from you. I agree with everything you have said about User:Xcryoftheafflictedx. I had started a complaint about him, but then User:Xcryoftheafflictedx backed off from what I was filing a complaint about and so I cancelled it. I was looking at his recent edits and it seems he has disappeared for now. So at least for now everyone can edit as they need to without annoying little brother following behind meddling with EVERYTHING. C&R 03:44, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] confusion on edit of EC

it said that you removed my entry because it "seemed to be a ongoing discussion instead of an entry" i wanted to get more specifics oh how and why you thought that... I really was trying to make it an entry, not a discussion.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitawhit (talkcontribs)

[edit] Random Smiley Award

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award
originated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

TomasBat 00:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:If you were born today single.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:If you were born today single.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:31, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Joan of arc single.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Joan of arc single.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:K Low split single.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:K Low split single.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:VBM.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:VBM.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Finechinatheband.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Finechinatheband.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image source problem with Image:Theprayerchain.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Theprayerchain.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 11:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Theprayerchain.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Theprayerchain.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 11:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Replaceable fair use Image:Calicosunsetband.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Calicosunsetband.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 04:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Low ep.jpeg

Thank you for uploading Image:Low ep.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:45, 8 March 2008 (UTC)