User talk:BYF079

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Contents

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with User:MQDuck/userboxes/Right To Resist. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Equazcion /C 13:17, 15 Jan 2008 (UTC) 13:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

Hi, Thank you for your reply. Wouldn't it be just fair to apply the same principals to you as well, meaning: if you oppose an idea...don't just go ahead and mark it for deletion ..instead discuss it and talk about it as you said!

[edit] Salam

Assalam Allaykom (Peace be upon you)

i have noticed that you are interested in the Arab World and its Culture, i would like to Invite you to Join the Arab Wiki Project.

our goals are to Increase the Public's Awarness and Develop Articles that are related to the Arab world, and help each others to achieve it, we are all good in certain things, so why not complete each others to make the Arab world a more Understood region for readers in Wikipedia...

i hope you join in, and get to explore the Project more, and add your name as a member in the Project...

Ma Assalama (Peace be with you)

--Arab League User (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tunisian Ligue Professionnelle 1 2006-07

I moved it to match the title of the main article: Tunisian Ligue Professionnelle 1 as should be the case. If this article title is wrong, please move it.

Also, do not mark my edits as vandalism. Doing so using Twinkle may result in your permission to use the tool being removed. пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:05, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hmm. I see you've reverted quite a few of my edits. This is not a readable article - we do not need massive copies of the club badges - the table is more than sufficient to provide the information. пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Also, when you want to add more than one template to an article, you can nest them, i.e.
{{fb start}}
{{Ligue Professional 1}}
{{Football in Tunisia}}
{{fb end}}
This removes the spaces between the templates and makes it look better. пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

Are you Tunisian soccer fan? Do you follow Tunisian soccer? Do you know how crazy Tunisians are about soccer?

It's quite significant to have the logos in every single article. To indicate the history and the differences. so please could you not do any cleanup in Tunisian soccer related pages unless you open a discussion about it, please. Also I'm well aware of the space that the layout leaves...and you think it looks better but it's not a fact ...since there was no survey about it.

One quick question: Why was your page Vandalised more than 15 times??

BYF079: "Faïcel Ben Yedder" (talk) 08:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but it isn't significant, and it isn't necessary and it makes the article much harder to read. Have a look at Premier League 2007-08; this is the kind of thing you should be aiming for. If you disagree, please bring it up on WT:FOOTY. As for the spaces between the boxes; if people were happy with it, they wouldn't have developed the nesting technique.
My userpage has been vandalised by morons who don't understand that articles about their 5-a-side football club, or ones that advertise their company, have no place on Wikipedia. пﮟოьεԻ 57 08:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

But who decides what goes into wikipedia and what doesn't?

[edit] Twinkle warning

Do not use Twinkle for edit such as this or this. Claiming other users' edits are vandalism when they are clearly not amounts to improper use. Next time you use it improperly you be reported and possibly have your privelege to use it removed. пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:26, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

If you really think I am only here to delete things, have a look at User:Number 57/New articles - this doesn't even include the 50+ articles on Israeli villages I have created recently. I don't have time to go around every group of articles, so if you know of something which isn't standard, then try to fix it yourself. пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:36, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


NOT EVERYTHING HAS TO BE SLANDERED...THERE SHOULD BE DIFFERENCES!

There is another reason you can't include the club badges (I had suspected it, but wasn't sure) as under fair use rules you can only use them in the article about the club itself. пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
By the way, I'm not slandering you, I'm just pointing out how things are generally done. We have to make the articles as readable as possible. Your contributions are more than welcome - Tunisia is probably one of the best covered African leagues thanks to your work. However, we all need to accept constructive criticism - when I first joined most of my edits were corrected, and now I look back at some of my early work, it is embarrasingly bad. I don't want to drive you away from Wikipedia, but please accept some advice. пﮟოьεԻ 57 09:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reply

That isn't the case if the article is still related to Tunisian football. Do you think that this is standard: Ligat ha'Al 2007-08 why don't you make it look like the English premiere league. Please give me some time and I'll make all those page and quite standard in my own way.

It is the case. Fair use rationale only allows the badges in one article, i.e. that of the club - have a look at the explanation in Image:Ipswich Town badge.gif. You cannot justify its use in season-by-season articles as it is not needed to identify the subject in them.
Aside from the map (which is a useful picture), the Ligat ha'Al 2007-08 is fairly standard, i.e. Introduction - League table - Results - Top scorers - Templates. I wouldn't have organised the results like that, but it doesn't make it unreadable. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:00, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
And the fact that the articles stayed deleted showed that I was justified in deleting them. пﮟოьεԻ 57 10:45, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Jaysweet (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit warring and use of (Twinkle) rollback on good faith edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Gwen Gale (talk) 14:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I've rolled back unnecessary and uncalled for changes made by Number75 who's going around and standardizing everything without even discussing it with others ...wikipedia isn't a space where one can impose his opinion on others in that manner...You can check his discussion page and see ho many users complained about his deletions...all i want him to do is call for a discussion before trying to impose a specific style on page that I've spent long hours to create."


Decline reason: "Doesn't excuse edit warring. See also WP:OWN. — Stifle (talk) 08:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Comment

The block is brief, appropriate, and will expire in less than a day. — Athaenara 08:45, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Please don't ever use Twinkle's rollback to revert good faith edits, no matter how much you don't like them and please don't edit war. Gwen Gale (talk) 12:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ban

The ban started on 14:16, 5 June 2008 (UTC) and it was supposed to last 24H meaning until 14:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC) shouldn't be over by now? And by the way, what other wa can I use to remove additions or to recover deleted text without using the Twinkle's. BYF079: "Faïcel Ben Yedder" (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Use the history tab! Happy editing, Gwen Gale (talk) 05:07, 7 June 2008 (UTC)