Talk:Business process outsourcing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Any reader would obviously ask "What is a business process?"
Furthermore, Business process doesn't really tell them. According to a recent Gartner report it consists of relatively menial tasks such as data entry, paperwork, call center work that requires vocational not university education.
I'm giving this input as a Wikiipedia user for educational purposes, the articles I contribute are in non-business areas. (Jonfernquest 07:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC))
- Business Process does not define a task, such as typing or answering phone calls. Business Process (as its name implies) defines a process required for a business outcome. This process is composed of a series of tasks, and Business Process (magazines not withstanding) does not define the sophistication of these tasks. Many business processes do consist of tasks that require a high level of training, such as a legal task or an architect task (software and hardware).
- Google's define function (as always) gives a good breadth of reputable sources' definitions.
- Piquin 19:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Currently, Recruitment Process Outsourcing has a page of its own, but its content substantially duplicates BPO so perhaps its worth merging the two. RPO could become a section of the BPO article. Any thoughts? Saganaki- 01:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Material on India
The material on India looks very interesting, but I'd propose deleting it if it can't be referenced. Saganaki- 01:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Well the whole article does not have references ( yet) so why single out only this portion ? Haphar 19:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Because its highly detailed and looks like it comes from a single source and should be verifiable. The rest of the article is composed of generalities which will need to be sourced, but the facts are not as "hard" as these datapoints.Saganaki- 05:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- It's even Industry size that has the hard details, not just India.Unless there are some contradicting data points that you have, the citation required tags should do. Haphar 13:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Where did you find the information? Is there no source attached to it?Saganaki- 00:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Newspaper reports, if one looks hard enough one would find some online versions, NASSCOM / The Economic Times would have carried it. Haphar 07:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
-
[edit] Offshore BPO vs Total BPO
I am confused about the distinction between offshore BPO and total BPO in the sentence in the Industry Size section comparing India's revenue from each:
"India has revenues of 6.4 Billion USD [2] from offshore BPO and 36 3 Billion USD from IT and total BPO."
Also, the sentence includes the IT industry in the total BPO comparison, and it is unclear why this is. IT in India as a large industry would presumably impact this comparison very significantly.
It is unclear what point this sentence is trying to make.
Piquin 19:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg
Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)