Wikipedia talk:Bureaucrats' noticeboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives

Note: The talk page should only be used for discussion about the way the noticeboard operates: what is appropriate to put on it, how to make people aware of it, who can post and why, etc. All general bureaucrat talk should go on the main page. Thanks.

Contents


[edit] Bureaucrats' noticeboard missing from Template:Editabuselinks?

Seems an obvious omission. Should be linked under the noticeboard section, but doesn't look like it will currently fit. ~Eliz81(C) 01:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Also, WP:BN appears to lack a navigational header at the moment. Crossposted from Template talk:Editabuselinks. ~Eliz81(C) 01:34, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Does the bureaucrat noticeboard have any particular relevance to editing abuse? I can't see that this board plays the same functions as the others listed on that template... WjBscribe 17:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing. BN isn't really a 'public' noticeboard. We wouldn't want the bureaucrats board to attract the same vandalism that AN and AN/I currently suffer. Plus {{editabuselinks}} is pretty full as it is. — Edokter • Talk • 18:46, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair enough, how about the RfA template?

This one specifically links the bureaucrats noticeboard anyway, and I think it's standard practice to have all pages included in a projectspace template transclude the template. It's just bizarre that there isn't a navigational header for the page. Presumably, transcluding this header onto WP:BN would only aid in navigating the site, not in encouraging vandalism? ~Eliz81(C) 23:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Y Done already. Anthøny 03:07, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] An experiment on WebSlices

I want to try out making the RfA report card a WebSlice, and am being bold and doing it (since it should not affect the functionality in any way). Please do not revert it within 15 minutes. Comments and suggestions (including whether to continue it after the fifteen minutes trial period) is welcome. --soum talk 17:50, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Test was successful - works like a charm. If you don't want this, feel free to remove it. Suggest any changes if you feel, I am all ears. :-P --soum talk 19:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)