Burmah Oil Co. v Lord Advocate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scots law

Flag of Scotland
This article is part of the series:
Courts of Scotland

Administration

Scottish Government
Cabinet Secretary for Justice
Judicial Appointments Board
Scottish Court Service
College of Justice
Office of the Public Guardian
Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
Scottish Prison Service

Civil courts

Privy Council
House of Lords
Court of Session
Lord President
Lord Justice Clerk
Lords of Session
Office of the Accountant of Court
Sheriff Court
Sheriff

Criminal courts

High Court of Justiciary
Lord Justice-General
Lord Justice Clerk
Lords Commissioner of Justiciary
Sheriff Court
Sheriff Principal
Sheriff
District Court
Justice of the Peace

Special courts

Court of the Lord Lyon
Lord Lyon King of Arms
Scottish Children's Reporter Administration
Children's Hearings
Scottish Land Court
Lands Tribunal for Scotland

Criminal justice

Lord Advocate
Crown Office
Advocate Depute
Procurator Fiscal

Advocates and solicitors

Faculty of Advocates
Advocate
Law Society of Scotland
Solicitor-Advocate
Solicitor

Burmah Oil Company Ltd. v Lord Advocate, [1965] AC 75, was a court case, raised in Scotland, and decided ultimately in the House of Lords. The case is an important decision in UK constitutional law and had unusual legal repercussions at the time.

This case concerned the destruction of oil fields in Burma by British forces during the Second World War. The sabotage was committed in order to prevent the plantations from falling into the hands of the advancing Japanese army.

The House of Lords held, by majority, that although the damage was lawful, it was the equivalent of requisitioning the property. Any act of requisition was done for the good of the public, at the expense of the individual proprietor, and for that reason, the proprietor should be compensated from public funds.

The result of the case was that the pursuers, Burmah Oil Company and others, should receive compensation for their destroyed plantations. In the end, the result was frustrated by the passing of a retrospective Act of Parliament, the War Damage Act 1965, which indemnified the Government for all acts of sabotage and other war damage. In operating retrospectively, this Act of Parliament is almost unique in the legal systems of the United Kingdom.

This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.