Talk:Bunny (webcomic)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bunny (webcomic) article.

Article policies
WikiProject Comics This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Mammals This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Mammal-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Article Deletion

Keep: Ok, I put in too many links the first time. Fixed now, please keep article. ~ Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 06:08, 2005 July 15 (UTC)

Keep: Article needs work to be more encyclopedic, but a good stub would be a nice addition as the comic in question is moderately popular. JeroenHoek 09:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikilinks to non-existing articles

My apologies for removing the wikilinks to the non-existing Wiki article on "Lem" Cyberskull, but I don't think he is notable enough to warrant a wiki article. The webcomic Bunny is pretty well known, and most of the people visiting the site remember that the artist is called Lem, but if you take away "Bunny" then he isn't anymore famous than you or me. Of course, if someone thinks differently and creates a great artcile on Lem (artist), then by all means, link him, but in all other cases a red wikilink should only be used when it is to be expected that that article should be part of Wikipedia, which isn't the case here. I'm afraid that an article on Lem won't survive a VfD. JeroenHoek 20:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gender Section

The Gender section seems to be entirely speculative. Additionally, the paragraph states that many of the gender-related comics were "created by people other than the strip's creator" and were therefore probably not canon. I therefore believe that it should be removed, per WP:Verify. I'll leave it for a few days, and if there haven't been any objections here I'll remove it. --Beezhive 03:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References

I think that the Discworld reference may have to be removed. Please refer to the Buttered Cat Paradox. It can't have just been Ponder Stibbons who mentioned it, though the idea is appealing. Hairyshoe 06:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. I don't see evidence to believe it originated solely from Terry Pratchett. Removing section. LadyPhi 16:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

someone should make a section about the family tree on comic 1015, of the date october 9, 2007. i would if i knew how 24.16.240.55 03:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)