Talk:Bumiputera

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Southeast Asia-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
	This article falls within the scope of the Brunei work group. If you are interested in articles relating to Brunei, please visit the project page to see how you can help.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bumiputera article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] Bumiputera is not the appropriate title

Bumiputera is not an appropriate title for this. I think it should be merged with the article 'Malay People'

(Keep88|Keep88) 2007-06-07 11:09am

Maybe it could be a subsection of Malay People, but it is really a concept like Bumiputra. --Novelty 11:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Any reason why this article does not have the appropriate title? __earth ^(Talk) 12:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

- Why is Bumiputera not the appropriate title? We already have Bumiputra and Ketuanan Melayu. Ketuanan Melayu has even been identified as a featured article with a non-English title. Also, despite the fact that the title may not be in English, WP:UE still applies here as well, since "Bumiputera" as a concept, is used in the Brunei English press, for example: [1] --Novelty (talk) 15:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)