User talk:Bully25
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Dead Rappers. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 16:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Danny the tourettes guy
This article has been recreated and redeleted many many times under Tourettes guy, but then, you probably knew that. Please don't recreate deleted content, it is considered vandalism. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourette's Guy and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourettes guy. Consensus is that he fails notability for Wikipedia until he has fame outside of hiw own website. There were also multiple attempts to get the article restored at WP:DRV, which also failed. Note that the article has been deleted about 15 times now. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Eminem
Please don't think I'm ganging up on you. I deleted your edits to [Eminem]] because we want the articles to appear timeless, we don't want to have to keep updating the page every time Hallie has a birthday. Thanks. :) User:Zoe|(talk) 00:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your Danny question
I did answer your question, please see above. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Contacting me
You can click on "Email this user" on my User or Talk pages, but I don't get a chance to read my email very often during the day. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
There should be a link on the left hand side of your screen when you're on my User or Talk pages which says "E-mail this user".
We can't have an article about him because consensus says so. Not one individual, but a number of individuals who discussed the topic and decided that he fails notability. Internet memes are very difficult to source as far as notability. User:Zoe|(talk) 00:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just to back this comment from Zoe, the subject has been discussed to death. It's been deleted 15 times at least, and I think there have been three or four deletion reviews, the result keeps coming out the same: no article. Wikipedia policies make it close to impossible to document this kind of thing here. That consensus is unlikely to change any time soon. Guy (Help!) 12:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Doggs
A tag has been placed on Doggs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Spellcast 07:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Nonsense of The Unholy Trinity of rap
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Unholy Trinity of rap, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Unholy Trinity of rap provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Unholy Trinity of rap, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate The Unholy Trinity of rap itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] August 2007
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Makavelism, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Elenseel 20:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IrishGuy talk 20:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Sleazy-E
A tag has been placed on Sleazy-E, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. carelesshx talk 14:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] April 2008
Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 06:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding Sesshomaru
I was just looking Sesshomaru's page over and saw the whole vandalism issue you had with him. He tried to do the same thing to me, claiming i added original content to something he apparently he thinks he's an expert on, but he's not, otherwise he'd know it wasn't original content. He doesn't even have enough guts to face the music, instead he sends generic messages then hides behind them like a coward. --Axeman 10 (talk) 04:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
