User talk:Buldożer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Buldożer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  – please continue to value-add to wikipedia. --Bhadani 13:11, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Nice to listen from you. I would suggest that you may write few words about you on your User page. We shall surely have more interaction. Thanks.

[edit] Username similar to yours

_ _ If you have also used the username [[1]] (without the dicritical mark), you should probably arrange to have those edits reattributed to User:Buldożer: as it is, it looks like someone was trying to confuse people into believing you had done edits that they did.
_ _ If that wasn't you, then the username should be permanently blocked from editing, since it is likely to be confused with yours intentionally or unintentionally. If you can find an admin online & answering messages, you could ask that it be done. If nothing happens soon, i am likely to block it soon, when i realize it hasn't been done.
--Jerzy•t 18:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
P.S.: Oh, and thanks for the Fisher edit. You weren't wrong to use "admiral", but "sailor" (for the admiral, not the bishop") is part of the "low-resolution terminology" for LoPbN, to avoid distraction of all users by detail not needed for identifying the bio link they want, which has plenty of detail just a click away. Same for "religious leader" in place of "bishop".
--Jerzy•t 18:48, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

_ _ Sheesh, i dunno what's wrong with me. I meant to leave a lk like this: Buldozer, for you to check & see if you recognized the edits as your own. Follow the new lk to see if you do, and let me know. You could also try signing onto it with passwords you would have used at the time, in case it's an account you've forgotten about. Then we'll think thru what to do about it.
_ _ On top of that, assuming it's not yours, i don't think what i first said is right, bcz the other name is the older one -- even tho it's been idle 3 years, and the editor was less active than you, i don't think we can just close it down -- contrary to what i seem to have been suggesting. I'll try to do a little research on what precedents do apply.
--Jerzy•t 17:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Don't forget to use the edit summaries

This is to remind you to use the edit summary shown at the bottom of the edit. I like the edits that you are doing so far, but it will make other users less suspicious of you if you do so. Thanks. Chris 12:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Thank you for adding the summaries in. Good job on your edits too. Chris 20:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)