Talk:Bullseye (retired pricing game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Merge
The merge will reduce confusion among the games with the same name. An alternative is to create a 'Bullseye article with information about both. Kramden4700 23:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think a merge would increase confusion, because the games are so remarkably different, although they have the same name. (Set aside the fact that the earlier version didn't have a game title mentioned or displayed.) I do think that a change needs to be made with the disambiguation of the two articles, as with the old and new versions of the Balance Game. The apostrophized name is not part of the title, and should be removed. Perhaps (retired/current pricing game)? —Twigboy 04:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- For what it's worth, I think I like that idea. -TPIRFanSteve 05:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
- I think it is a good idea as it gives more context, something that these TPIR articles seem to lack, as they are written in a WP:NPOV violating fanboy style. Rekarb Bob 17:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bullseye1972.jpg
Image:Bullseye1972.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)