Talk:Bullseye (comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (publisher): Marvel Comics work group

The origin seems to switch between calling Bullseye "Lester" and "Leonard." Either that, or it doesn't make any sense at all. Could someone who knows please correct it?

Thx

Contents 1 Bullseye II? 2 Bullseye II, Fanfilm Appearance 3 Tagged for cleanup 4 Bullseye's Adamantium reinforced skeleton 5 Fair use rationale for Image:Bullseyemovie.jpg 6 Fair use rationale for Image:Bullseyemurdockpapers.jpg

[edit] Bullseye II?

I've always been confused as Wizard has, at least in the past, always listed this gentleman as "Bullseye II". Any info on this situation and/or the original Bullseye would be appreciated.--65.245.5.224 03:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Bill

[edit] Bullseye II, Fanfilm Appearance

The earlier Bullseye was a one-shot Hydra assassin from the late 1960's run of Nick Fury. He apparently is not the same entity as the one this entry covers.

Aside from that, I should note that Bullseye appeared in the famous (for a fan film) Green Goblin's Last Stand fanfilm (as did Mysterio). This is odd since Bullseye had never met the Green Goblin!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Byyz9ZchKBQ&search=Goblin%20Stand

http://files.filefront.com/Green+Goblins+Last+Stand/;944220;;/fileinfo.html

"Ultimate Bullseye In the Ultimate Marvel continuity, Bullseye appeared in Ultimate Elektra as an assassin named Benjamin Poindexter. He works for the Kingpin and was his prime assassin until Elektra beat him in direct hand-to-hand combat"

elektra cheated

[edit] Tagged for cleanup

I've tagged this article - it needs some work. I'm removing the most egregious phrase:

In a cameo, canon (Disputed if it is canon or not, because in All Access #1, which is a continuation from DC vs Marvel, Spider-man brings Venom to jail and refers to the truce Spider-man and Venom made) appearance in the "DC vs Marvel" storyline

That's just a mess. Anybody care to help improve the rest of the article? --Chancemichaels 15:40, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Chancemichaels

I have it a once-over. It needs copy-editing by someone who is also a Marvel Comics expert. I'm not really familiar with some of the later storylines.Konczewski 22:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

I fixed a very few things (mostly headers), but I think the article is looking pretty good for the most part.Ugnut 06:44, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Do any of you wikidiots have any clue how to cite a literary text? Present tense is the norm. Confused? Try MLA or any real source of info (ie, something printed on paper and edited by an accountable editor). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.188.17 (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bullseye's Adamantium reinforced skeleton

What issue revealed that Bullseye's skeleton was reinforced with strips of Adamantium? I was under the impression that only some of his vertebrae were Adamantium (Daredevil #197-199).74.244.63.126 00:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

His skeleton (or parts of it, I don't remember) is laced with adamantium, whereas characters like Wolverine have it across most or all of his skeleton. Notthegoatseguy 16:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

The bio is confusing. It states that the second origin is probably fabricated, and then backs this up by saying it's consistent with other dialogue(???). It then seems to discredit the second origin completely when it references a story where he kills his father, who he supposedly already killed in the second origin. 66.167.233.99 21:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the bio info, the only two people who know about Bullseye's formative years definitively are Bullseye and Daredevil. This is proven by the very disturbed and panicked reaction Bullseye had the first time Daredevil called him "Lester". Therefore it is more than likely that he had several fathers including the one he killed in a trailer park but only found out that his biological father was the one in "Greatest Hits" recently. As to the information about his skeleton, Bullseye's injuries during the Murdock Papers storyline imply that his legs and ribs are not reinforced but the punch he gave Daredevil in Guardian Devil implies that his fists are.

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bullseyemovie.jpg

Image:Bullseyemovie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Bullseyemurdockpapers.jpg

Image:Bullseyemurdockpapers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)