Talk:Bugun Liocichla

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Bugun Liocichla has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on September 14, 2006.
October 5, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
To-do list for Bugun Liocichla:
  • get to FA status
  • contact image taker and request free use
WikiProject Birds Bugun Liocichla is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Old comments

I ranked this medium importance due to it being a current event. Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Now that we have a free image (great work Shyamal!) aren't we obliged to get rid of the fair use one? Fair use in this case is justified by the absence of a free image. Sabine's Sunbird talk 04:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I was actually quite surprised by the presence of the photograph. I do believe the author Ramana Athreya would consider contributing the image if someone sought it but until then I think it is not fair-use enough. Shyamal 05:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
I took it out and replaced it with yours. We should attempt to contact him for a free photograph (maybe he has others he can share, there are certainly plenty in the paper), until then we have a free one. Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good article nomination

My suggestions:

  • lead is too short
  • Is there a link for Emei Shan Liocichla?
  • "Small flocks are observed during January, whereas pairs were observed in May, with an estimated total of 14 individuals." (Source?)
  • "The species was described in 2006..." (Source?)
  • There aren't any external links.

NCurse work 21:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The Emei Shan Liocichla is the same thing as the Grey-faced Liocichla. Incidenatlly, the sole source is the article describing it (from 2006). I have to say I'm uncertain this is GA quality yet. Sabine's Sunbird talk 03:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
My suggestions were answered, but I'll wait until Sabine's Sunbird expresses a new opinion. Anyway thanks for the work. NCurse work 05:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I am confident that the article meets the GA criteria and so am passing it as the hold has run for well over a week. Eluchil404 21:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Field sketch link under External links

I removed this link from the section External links as it was not linking to the Field sketch as claimed. I tried to look where on the OB site the sketch is but drew a naught. Hope somebody can add the correct link. Prashanthns (talk) 01:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)