Template talk:Buddhism2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Category:Buddhism
I'm wondering around the wisdom of including Category:Buddhism in this template. All the articles which uses this template will automatically be placed in the catebory which is rather large. --Salix alba (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely not a good idea. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 04:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- I see that it has long since been removed; however, some of the pages still show up in Category:Buddhism because of some sort of cacheing. That problem should resolve itself in time. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 04:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Color Scheme
For the sake of "branding"/consistency, I'm somewhat inclined to modify this template's color scheme to match the recently modified color scheme of the Template:Buddhism article. If so, this template would then go from looking like this:
Buddhism | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Terms and concepts | History | Schools and sects | People | By region and country | ||||
List of topics | Timeline | Temples | Texts | Culture | ||||
|
|
To looking something like this (with some textual condensation) perhaps:
|
• • |
• • |
• • |
• • |
|
|||||
|
|
Any objections? If none identified in the two weeks or so, I'll go ahead and make the change. Thanks! Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC) P.S. I am concerned that somehow I made this template taller -- can anyone shrink it back down in terms of height ;-)
- No objections identified in nearly three months time; thus, change will be made shortly for the aforementioned reasons (and prompted in part due to the act of vandalism that changed the Buddha to a lime-green on the original template). Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wrong color
You should consider changing the color of the Buddhism2 template. I saw it and thought I had new messages. When I realized I had no mesaages, it caused me a great deal of Dukkha. --The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 17:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)