Template talk:Buddhism2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Category:Buddhism

I'm wondering around the wisdom of including Category:Buddhism in this template. All the articles which uses this template will automatically be placed in the catebory which is rather large. --Salix alba (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Definitely not a good idea. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 04:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
I see that it has long since been removed; however, some of the pages still show up in Category:Buddhism because of some sort of cacheing. That problem should resolve itself in time. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 04:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Color Scheme

For the sake of "branding"/consistency, I'm somewhat inclined to modify this template's color scheme to match the recently modified color scheme of the Template:Buddhism article. If so, this template would then go from looking like this:

Buddha in a lotus Buddhism Buddha in a lotus
Terms and concepts History Schools and sects People By region and country
List of topics Timeline Temples Texts Culture
Portal
v  d  e

To looking something like this (with some textual condensation) perhaps:

Buddha in a lotus

Buddhism

Buddha in a lotus

 

Concepts
Topics


History
Timeline


Schools
Texts


People
Places


Culture
Temples

 

 

Portal
v  d  e

Any objections? If none identified in the two weeks or so, I'll go ahead and make the change. Thanks! Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC) P.S. I am concerned that somehow I made this template taller -- can anyone shrink it back down in terms of height ;-)

No objections identified in nearly three months time; thus, change will be made shortly for the aforementioned reasons (and prompted in part due to the act of vandalism that changed the Buddha to a lime-green on the original template). Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 08:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wrong color

You should consider changing the color of the Buddhism2 template. I saw it and thought I had new messages. When I realized I had no mesaages, it caused me a great deal of Dukkha. --The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 17:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)