Talk:Buccaneer Yacht Club
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. |
[edit] Speedy deletion
Please do not delete this page. Editors work in real time and not in bot time. It normally takes a few days to get an article up and running, especially when the editor has to live in the real world.Trilobitealive (talk) 15:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have changed the CSD tag to a PROD nomination, which gives you five days to bring the article up to inclusion standards. Please be sure to read Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). Good luck. — Satori Son 15:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, the PROD is fine, but when I first looked at it I didn't see any major assertion of notability and I tried looking for sources.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well thank you. At this point I've added sufficient references and discussion for it to be equally notable (in my humble opinion) to a many of the sports related articles I've seen on Wikipedia. I've been introduced to an interesting controversy today, that which might be loosely termed writers versus erasers. Erasers have been around a long time, (see Library of Alexandria) but they've been flying under my radar here up to now.Trilobitealive (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, the tool we administrators use here is not an eraser, it's called The Mop. And if it was never used, we'd all be wading in shit. But, you did a nice job getting this article up to standards. Thanks. — Satori Son 13:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well thank you. At this point I've added sufficient references and discussion for it to be equally notable (in my humble opinion) to a many of the sports related articles I've seen on Wikipedia. I've been introduced to an interesting controversy today, that which might be loosely termed writers versus erasers. Erasers have been around a long time, (see Library of Alexandria) but they've been flying under my radar here up to now.Trilobitealive (talk) 03:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree, the PROD is fine, but when I first looked at it I didn't see any major assertion of notability and I tried looking for sources.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:23, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion contested
At this point I'm contesting the deletion process and removing the notice from the article. This article is sufficiently notable at this time.Trilobitealive (talk) 22:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- It looks like this article is up and running so I'm moving on to something else.Regards all.Trilobitealive (talk) 00:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
