User talk:Bsskchaitanya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] A welcome from Emersoni
Hello, Bsskchaitanya, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- If you haven't already, drop by the New user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
- Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments.
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- Simplified Ruleset
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Glossary
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.
Enjoy your stay with Wikipedia!
Emersoni 08:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] India related links
|
||
Newcomers: Welcome kit | Register: Indian Wikipedians | Network: Noticeboard (WP:INWNB) Browse: India | Open tasks | Deletions |
Please use edit summaries and Show preview button more often, Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 13:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] JU
thanks for fixing the pipe in the JU infobox. it was driving me crazy! -- Rimi 15:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dot over s
Should there not be a dot over the s in pradesam? Please review in your recent edit on Adi Shankara page. Also please change the Disciple into shishya to maintain the consistency of using Sanskrit words in the title row. Thanks. Apnavana 10:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bouloussou Soubramaniam Sastroulou
Bonjour Bsskchaitanya,
J'ai vu que tu as créé une page sur la WP:en à propos de Bouloussou Soubramaniam Sastroulou.
Est-ce toi aussi qui a créé sous IP la page de la WP francophone sur la même personne?
Comme elle ne correspond pas tout à fait aux critères d'admission, elle a été proposée à la suppression ([1]). Tu devrais peut-être venir donner ton avis. En tout cas, il ne faut pas enlever le bandeau sur l'article, mais défendre ton avis en expliquant pourquoi tu trouves que cette page devrait rester dans WP.
--Moumine70 12:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re: Sanskrit
No problem, Chaitanya. I just looked at the edit history to find out who. And, thanks for your interest at Talk:Sanskrit. -- Sundar \talk \contribs 11:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] R&AW
Hi Chaitanya, thank you for changing the tag Satya meva jayate to Satyam eva jayate at the RAW page. However a wikipedian has raised some doubts over the transition at the talk page of RAW. Please do visit the talk page and clear the doubt. Legaleagle86 14:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Yanaon.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Yanaon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nawab
I see you've been creating entries about the Nawab family. Unfortunately these miss the most important information. A lead section that gives the basic information. The beginning of Nawab Sayyid Ghulam Muhammad Ali Khan I Bahadur doesn't state he's Indian royalty, I only see that in the stub tag. Please say something to the effect of "Nawab Sayyid Ghulam Muhammad Ali Khan I Bahadur was Xth sultan of Y." so people know what the article is about. - Mgm|(talk) 10:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Sanskrit
No problems sir. I was referring to vandals. Whether we like it or not vandals and trolls exist on Wikipedia. The fellow who complained at Talk:Sanskrit#It_is_not_the_nationwide_language_dears says the Sanskrit article on Wikipedia is a hyped article - that we are giving it as much hype to it as possible. He also says "Please provide some useful or if u dare give REAL facts about sanskrit."
He is most likely a troll who is not going to bother reading your essay on sanskrit posted at Talk:Sanskrit. Why bother wasting your time by replying to his rants? The Talk:Sanskrit page is not to reply to trolls, its about discussing things which pertain to the article only. Bernard Shaw said "I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it." So ignore this kind of persons. ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 13:39, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Retroflex approximant
Hi, recently you have added Telugu to the list of languages in the article Retroflex approximant. This is incorrect. Please listen to the sound file in that page - as far I know, this sound can be heard only in Tamil and Malayalam among major Indian langauages. I still remember how much I had to struggle to teach my Telugu friends how to pronounce Malayalam "ഴ" - ழ in Tamil - :) . Hope you would revert the change. Somebody had added Marathi and Vedic Sanscrit to the list and I removed them sometime back (please see the discussion page of the article). Maybe people tend to confuse this with Retroflex lateral approximant, which is a totally different sound. - sooraj 21:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate your knowledge of Dravidian languages. Being able to speak both Tamil and Telugu at a native level is definitely something that I would envy about; and I did notice it in your profile before I put the comment. But I have to say that you have misunderstood what a Retroflex approximant is. You yourself has admitted that "Zha" (ழ)is not present in modern Telugu. It is exactly this "zha" that is called Retroflex approximant. Please listen to the sound sample in that article, convince yourself and revert your edit. - sooraj 20:57, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, I am no linguistics expert, but this is what I know about "chillaksharams" in Malayalam script: Certain consonants of the Malayalam alphabet (ണ, ന, റ, ല, ള) are extensively used without having a vowel attached to them (especially at the end of words and prefixes) and these "pure consonants" are denoted by a different set of letters called "chillaksharangal" (ണ്, ന്, ര്, ല്, ള്). When a consonant does not have a corresponding chillaksharam, its pure form is denoted by adding a special sign called "chandrakkala" above it. Even those letters that have a "chillaksharam" form may sometimes be used with a "chandrakkala" to show the pure consonant. Hope this helps you. sooraj 20:13, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Brahmi Chart.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Brahmi Chart.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hi
Nice to get in touch again. I see that you put up some links at Wikipedia:WikiProject_India/Assessment. Please dont strike out the links yourself, that's the job of the person who makes the assessment. He will strike out the link to indicate that assessment has been completed for the articles indicated. This time you need not do anything, but from next time you submit the article, please dont strike it out. Thanks & Regards. ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 16:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of Iyers
Please don't move List of Iyers to "Famous Iyers". It is a POV title. The general naming convention for lists of people is "List of xyz", and not "Famous xyz". Thanks. utcursch | talk 04:56, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Yanam - india article
Some impressive work here - keep it up!! I've reassessed it, but it is still at a "B" level. I've written my comments about why on the article talk page - once you fix these bits up, we can consider a higher grade. Good luck. Ncmvocalist 13:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Manyam Zamindar may be deleted
A tag has been placed on Manyam Zamindar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Will (Talk - contribs) 06:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] telugu help needed
Please see {{User te-2}} . I would have put in a rough translation (using telugu script with the tamil translation) but I figured you could do it better. Can you translate the userbox? Thanks. I realized I understood telugu quite well after seeing annamayaa.T*E*H Kingrom 17:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for the Commandments Image on the Sunday Schools page DJ 20:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Hello Chaitanya
Hi. I have seen you various articles on yanam. Nice to see you have contributed well. I have written the article Dadala Raphael Ramanayya and uploaded some very rare pictures not available anywhere. But they got deleted due to lack of license tags. Actually I do not have much idea on how to attach license tags. I have uploaded again and rqst you to help secure them. pdadala
[edit] Hi Chaitanya
Thanks for checking the tags for me. Yes I have removed certain matter which will not have answers but instead create and sustain unfounded rumours. It is not right to write things on public domain on hearsay., esp of people who had mattered to our country. But neverthless, I should appreciate you for airing your views. May be i could allow you to read Dadala's autobiography which was then written for select audience and private circulation. It was published in private capacity sometime during 70's and went out of circulation later on. Seasons greetings to you my Friend. - Pdadala
[edit] Vandalism Warning
Thank you for experimenting with the page List of Telugu Brahmins on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Sfacets 13:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dravidian Wiki Project
Hello Bsskchaitanya,
I saw your edit on Dravidian topics template. It was a pleasant surprise to see someone taking part in editing the Dravidian topics template in regards to Dravidian culture since I have thought of forming a Dravidian Wiki Project. This will help expand on the topics of different Dravidian ethnic groups such as the Kannadigas, Telugus, Tamils, Malayalis, and more Dravidian groups. This project will also go beyond borders to include the Brahui Dravdians of Pakistan, and the Malto people of Bangladesh. It will also expand on the dances, arts, and literature of each Dravidian group in South Asia. Furthermore, the Dravidian people page needs a lot of work to be done due to vandals and others changing the info on the page and filling it with major POVs. So much so, the page on Dravidian people has been turned into a propoganda tool to discredit Dravidians for their existence. Earlier, I have put a map showing the different regions Dravidians are in along with some pics of different Dravidians, Vedda Dravidians, and Australian aboriginals to show similarities. On the Talk:Dravidian people there is a small discussion in regards to the existence of Dravidians. Therefore, I have put a neutralitiy/factual accuracy tag and a cleanup tag on the page. Administration has been notified of this. Having you on this team would be a plus and starting a Dravidian Wiki Project would be of benefit to wikipedia and its readers for further knowledge of other cultures. Please let me know if you would be interested. Regards.
Wiki Raja 23:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello again,
I have also created the Dravidian martial arts page. We can do more with Dravidian Wiki Project. Also, it would be great if someone could get me info on martial arts in Karnataka and Andra Pradesh. Take care.
Wiki Raja 23:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Wallajah2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wallajah2.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kris (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image source
Hi, a user who goes around tagging images in bad faith has tagged Wallajah2.jpg which you uploaded. Can you please follow this up? thanks Parthi talk/contribs 05:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, It's not sufficient to provide references as you have done for Image:Wallajah2.jpg. You need to specify where you sourced the image from. In this case, if the portrait is over sixy years old then you can use the {{PD-Old}} tag. If it is an artwork whose author is dead over 100 years ago, then you can use {{pd-art}}. Thanks Parthi talk/contribs 07:51, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Happy new year to you too (belated)
Thanks for your wishes, I'll have a look at the Yanam article soon. Kris (talk) 23:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, that is excellent and exhaustive work on Yanam. Kudos. I can see only 2 areas which can improve:
- The contents box size needs to be reduced.
- References should better come from a mix of sources, now its only from one source.
Do let me know if I can be of any help. Kris (talk) 23:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hi Chaitanya
I am really sorry. Unfortunately I do not have any key reference materials on people you mentioned below. If I stumble across any info, I will be glad to contribute to the best of my ability. I have great love and regards towards Yanam and its wonderful people. But also in a way, just like you said, I have understood through Monsieur Dadala who had many times during his later years passionately expressed great feelings about the France, its culture and its people. But like you said history is history and we have to learn adapting to the changes in the process of evolution. You are most welcome to peruse the autobiographical copy I have on Monsieur Dadala. I have replied your email today. Pls check. bye take care —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pdadala (talk • contribs) 10:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
[edit] Your attention is required with Image:Wallajah2.jpg
Hi. User:Srkris has been maliciously tagging this image as 'no license' although the image had the correct {{pd-art}} tag. Can you please look into this and warn this user to stop his distruptive editing? thanks Parthi talk/contribs 04:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Uploading images found on internet
Hi Bssk, thanks again for writing to me about this. Please dont upload images found on internet unless you are sure that they are freely licensed. If you have any doubts, please let me know, and I'll have a look into it. Thanks. Kris (talk) 17:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ganapatideva inscription image
How did you get the image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kakatiya_Ganapati_Deva_inscription.jpg? Is this free or you got permission? mlpkr 20:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, but the website does not mention copyright or anything? Looks like they scanned from a book, and so does not it come under their ownership? I think either you need to get a mail or they have to release under no copyright. The website does not mention any copright. http://www.engr.mun.ca/~adluri/telugu/language/script/script1d.html mlpkr 15:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Editors that don't provide an edit summary tend to look like vandals
I have noticed you commonly don't enter an edit summary as you didn't when you edited Manyam Zamindar (see this edit). This causes me problems. When I patrol for vandalism, I use the summary to make a preliminary decision on whether or not the post is a vandal edit or not. If the summary is present (or at least a section header, the part inside the /* */), I commonly decide the edit is legit and move on.
However, if no edit summary is available, I typically resort to loading the diff for the edit. This takes time. For that reason, if your edits are all valid, I ask that you provide edit summaries. For more on how to enter an edit summary, please read Help:Edit summary.
Incidentally, it is not just me that appreciate having edit summaries. When you omit your summary, you may be telling various bots that you are vandalizing pages. For this reason, please consider providing that summary. It is very important. You can enter that summary via the edit summary box on edit pages (as shown below).
- Page history - list of changes to the page you edited
- User contributions - list of all your edits
- Watchlist* - list of recent changes to watched pages (logged-in users only)
- diff page - shows the difference between two edits
- Recent changes - list of all recent edits
- Wikipedia IRC channels - real time list of all edits
- Related changes - list of recent changes to pages linked to the page you edited
- List of new pages: shows the edit summary of the creation.
For more tips on how to avoid being mistaken for a vandal, please visit Steps You Can Take to Avoid Being Thought of as a Vandal.
You appear to rely on the section links (the part inside the /* */ part). We need more information than simply which section you edited. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- First, it sounds like you might be able to communicate better in French than English. If this is true, I can attempt to find a French speaker to help you out.
- Second, I never stated you were a vandal. I knew you weren't when I saw your diff. The problem is that the diff must be loaded (taking time that I would prefer to be chasing real vandals). If I thought you might have been a vandal, a bot, with more limited intelligence, might as well. Will (Talk - contribs) 08:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sanskrit
Thanks for your additions; we have a number of articles on traditional Sanskrit grammar, viz., Vyakarana, Shiksha, Shiva Sutras, Ashtadhyayi, Ganapatha, Dhatupatha. These would all need a lot of work I cannot seem to get around doing, you are most welcome to contribute there. regards, dab (𒁳) 14:31, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] INT, France
I, I've just seen your message on my account. I'm a 3rd year student at TELECOM INT (the engineering school of the INT). I'm currently doing a one-year internship in Paris. You can ask me what you want about the 2 INT schools (by e-mail if you want). Are you an engineering or business student? undergraduate, graduate, or postgraduate? You can find some elements in the official INT sites (see the wiki pages) I'm looking forward to your questions, Regards, Meuniea 21:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Les Comptoirs de l'Inde.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Les Comptoirs de l'Inde.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to WikiProject France
|
STTW (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wow!
Thanks a lot for the barnstar. It was totally unexpected. I'm finding myself a bit busy now, but I'll sure co-ordinate with you for those articles soon. Thanks again Kris (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
By the way, did you see this Wikipedia:Peer_review/Automated/December_2006#Yanam_.28India.29?
[edit] Please resolve contradiction
Can you please resolve the apparent contradiction you wrote in Nawab Sayyid Husain Ali II Khan Bahadur? Many thanks! Chesdovi 14:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Bastille Day De Gaulle.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bastille Day De Gaulle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] One more barnstar for you
The India Star | ||
For your contributions to Yanam, Puducherry and articles related to French India. Victor D PARLE 18:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC) |
[edit] Bonjour
I don't understand : The image you imported was false : Image:Partners of ParisTech.gif. Didn't you checked the official web site ? Anyway, "pas de rancune", errare humanum est :-) MaCRoEco 22:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] My Struggle for freedom of French Provinces in India, autobiographie de Sri Dadala Raphael Ramanayya
Could you tell me where I can find this book? I am visiting India on a four month educational program soon, and I would love to learn about the coup d'etat de Yanaon. Thanks. Simakobu 03:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Telugu Script
Dear Mr Chaitanya, I have seen the input you made in the article on 'Telugu Script' and I appreciate your effort. I would like to bring to your attention many articles being written in Wiki which mention that Telugu script evolved from Kannada scipt. Historians always mentioned the common script as 'Telugu-Kannada' script. The spread of original Brahmi from coastal Andhra (Bhattiprolu) to west India and further down to Kannada-speaking areas is a strong basis to argue that it was Telugu script that gave rise to modern Kannada script. Please correct me if I am wrong. Is there any historical evidence to show that the original home of Chalukyans was Rayalaseema region and that they spoke Telugu? Kumarrao 11:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Origin
Dear Mr Chaitanya, The Brahmi Script chart put by you in the article is very misleading. It gives an impression that Telugu script originated from the Kannada script. In fact, many Kannada enthusiasts in wikipedia are now insisting upon this matter. It is well-known that Bhattiprolu Brahmi script evolved into Telugu-Kannada script which diversified later into two independent scripts. The National Museum displays which are included in the article would serve the purpose. The chart can be deleted.Kumarrao 08:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request
Please do something about my request made above. The Tables T1 and T2 in the article Telugu script clearly mentioned the evolution of Bhattiprolu Brahmi script into 5th century Telugu-Kannada script of Salankayana period. Based on the chart placed by you, Users like Gnanapiti have been insisting that Telugu script has originated and evolved from 'Old Kannada script'. Kumarrao 06:16, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request #2
The Figures 1 and 2 in the articles Telugu script and Telugu language figures clearly mention the evolution of Brahmi script of Mauryan times towards modern Telugu and Kannada scripts. It is as given below:
1. Brahmi script of Mauryan period (3rd centrury BCE)
2. Brahmi script on Bhattiprolu Urn containing Buddha's dhatus (3rd century BCE)
3. Brahmi script of Satavahana period (1st centurey CE)
4. Brahmi script of Ikshvaku period (3d century CE)
5. Brahmi script of Gupta period (4th century CE)
6. Ancient Telugu-Kannada script of Salankayana period (5th century)
7. Tamil scripts of Pallava period (7th century)
8. Telugu-Kannada script of 7th century
9. Telugu-Kannada script of Eastern Chalukyas (10th century)
10. Telugu-Kannada script of Rajarajanarendra period (11th century)
11. Telugu-Kannada script of Kakatiya Ganapatideva (13th century)
12. Telugu script of Prolaya Vemareddy (14th century).
It is thus very clear that both the scripts had a common origin in Brahmi script as found on Bhattiprolu stupa urn. To call it s "Old Kannada" script is nothing but travesty of history, even though some authors might have referred it so. In fact, these figures were sourced from the same citation (Adluri, Seshu Madhava Rao Parachuri, Sreenivas. Origins of Telugu Script) which Gnanapiti refers to. But, Gnanapiti does not want to take cognizance of it. As a compromise, I agreed that it can be written as:
"The Telugu script is derived from Telugu-Kannada script which is also known as old Kannada script and developed independently at the same time as modern Kannada script which is why it has strong resemblance with it"
However, Gnanapiti insists that it should be "Old Kannada" rather than "Telugu-Kannada". It is plain chauvanism being imposed on articles regarding Telugu, Telugu language and Telugu script. Wiki should not encourage such fanaicas and chauvanists. Kumarrao 09:33, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Final request
Dear Mr Chaitanya, I wonder why you have ingnored my previous requests. I have been waging a lone battle against a bunch of irrational fanatics regardimg my edits to Telugu script and Telugu language. If you think my point of view was wrong, say so. I shall stop this thing. I am asking you because you were the user who inserted the chart under contention and which is being exploited by others by ignoring other inputs.Kumarrao 09:39, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Frustration
I am thoroughly convinced that Wikipedia is a highly susceptible tool for spreading falsehoods by a group(s) of people who can collude among themselves and then twist, distort and protect their articles from well-meaning Users. At the same time, they can prevent others from editing their contributions in a clever and premediated fashion. I do not regret that I lost to a bunch of fanatics and chauvanists. I only hope that Wikipedia owners, administrators and others take notice of my frustration and amend the guidelines to make Wiki more credible and authentic. Kumarrao 14:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:
Replied to your harpings here.Gnanapiti 15:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Telugu script
Dear Mr Chaitanya,
I live in Delhi. I visted National museum three times. There is a gallery devoted to Indian languages, scrits and their evolution. There are many display boards which clearly depict the evolution of Brahmi script. I watched many boards in which Bhatiprolu Brahmi scrpit was shown to have evolved into Telugu-Kannada common script. I did not find any mention of the word "Old Kannada" anywhere. I am sure the displays were painstaking works of scores of British and Indian linguists and historians. I really do not know who created this 'Old Kannada' theory and how some books and websites give credence to this. The chart you placed in the article has been exploited by a bunch of fanatics to insist that Telugu script evolved from 'old Kannada' script, that too in Telugu articles. They would not like to look at the two figures you placed in which 'Telugu-Kannada' was mentioned. On top of it, they brand the souce as unreliable (the same source they cite to stick to'Old Kannada' theory). Few sentences of Adluri written in his webpages in good faith and which reflect his sincere intentions are cited to say that Adluri is not a historian. On the other hand, a couple of guys who have created websites which are drenched with Kannada-centric theories of Indian history are great authorities of Indian history. I have given up arguing with this bunch of fanatics. If someone wants to take up the baton, welcome.Kumarrao 06:27, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
--Mr Chaitanya's view point is correct. It is sad that some Users are interested in establishing the 'superiority' of their language, region etc., by collaborating with each other, selectively citing some evidences, quoting unknown writers, citing webpages and on top of it, browbeating well-meaning and impassionate Users. Plenty of such indications are available in Kannada and Karnataka related articles. I should say they are during a 'terrific' job.Kumarrao 12:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Mr Chaitanya,
Please protect my edits in Telugu language. Kumarrao 11:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Asokan_Brahmi_inscription.jpg
[edit] Hai
Hi Chaitanya,
Your knowledge on Dravidian language is awesome.I have a doubt.Some experts are on opinion that Telugu and Malayalam scripts can represent any language in Inbia.Is it true?
Pls help...
ARUNKUMAR P.R 07:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Vishnukundina inscription.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Vishnukundina inscription.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Vishnukundina inscription.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Vishnukundina inscription.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:21, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Pallava Narasimha Varma I inscription.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Pallava Narasimha Varma I inscription.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Pallava Narasimha Varma I inscription.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Pallava Narasimha Varma I inscription.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Chalukya Bhima II inscription.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Chalukya Bhima II inscription.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Chalukya Bhima II inscription.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Chalukya Bhima II inscription.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Chalukya Rajaraja Narendra inscription.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Chalukya Rajaraja Narendra inscription.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Chalukya Rajaraja Narendra inscription.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Chalukya Rajaraja Narendra inscription.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Kakatiya Ganapati Deva inscription.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Kakatiya Ganapati Deva inscription.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Kakatiya Ganapati Deva inscription.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Kakatiya Ganapati Deva inscription.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Inscription at time Errana.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Inscription at time Errana.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Inscription at time Errana.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Inscription at time Errana.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Inscription at time Srinatha.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Inscription at time Srinatha.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Inscription at time Srinatha.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Inscription at time Srinatha.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Inscription at time of Krishnadeva Raya.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Inscription at time of Krishnadeva Raya.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Inscription at time of Krishnadeva Raya.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Inscription at time of Krishnadeva Raya.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Christian writings in Telugu (1747).jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Christian writings in Telugu (1747).jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Christian writings in Telugu (1747).jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Christian writings in Telugu (1747).jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Printed Telugu from the 1817 grammar by William Brown.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Printed Telugu from the 1817 grammar by William Brown.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Printed Telugu from the 1817 grammar by William Brown.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Printed Telugu from the 1817 grammar by William Brown.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright violation in Image:Salankayana Nandivarma inscription.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Salankayana Nandivarma inscription.jpg, by Sarvagnya (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Salankayana Nandivarma inscription.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Salankayana Nandivarma inscription.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:07, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Bastille_Day_De_Gaulle.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bastille_Day_De_Gaulle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 13:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Brahmi Script.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brahmi Script.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Zamkudi Dhokla queen! 09:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Bouloussou_Soubramaniam_Sastroulou.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bouloussou_Soubramaniam_Sastroulou.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Telugu script
Dear Mr Chaitanya,
The article is totally changed now. Inspite of my requests the figures of inscriptions were deleted. Please revisit the article and place the evolution chart and a few figures of the inscriptions from alternate sources.Kumarrao 16:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
---The article is your baby. I tried to nurture it. It is now being tortured by others. Save it.Kumarrao 10:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Brahmi Chart.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brahmi Chart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:30, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Request for help over sanskrit caption of R&AW
Hello, I would request you to kindly look into the devnagri seal caption of R&AW, which is given as धर्मो रक्षति रक्षित for Dharmo Rakshati Rakshitaha. I wish to know if it is correct in devnagri script. The english caption is correct, also can you tell the meaning of the motto in english LegalEagle 16:23, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot LegalEagle 03:14, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kurów
Could you please write a stub http://sa.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurow – just a few sentences based on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kur%C3%B3w ? Only 5-10 sentences enough. Please.
PS. Article about Kurów is already on 236 languages and dialects. If you do that, please put interwiki link into English version. If your village/town/city isn't yet on PL wiki, I can do article about it. (I'm first author of requests) Pietras1988 TALK 15:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] WikiProject Newsletter n°1
Bonjour and welcome to the first WikiProject France newsletter!! It should become a monthly special of our project, but until the next issue, here are some points to consider for the month:
- In an effort to determine the active members from the inactive, all members are asked to simply sign on my special userpage.
- I have slightly rearranged and updated the Project page, putting all the featured lists in collapsible tables. This unclutteres the page and you only have to see them if you want to. Give your feelings at the talk page.
- I have made a Wikipedia advert for our project, Image:Qxz-ad108.gif, what do you think? Personally I feel the words need improving ...
- There are still map problems at Template:French commune - any help at resolving them would be greatly appreciated.
- What about starting a monthly drive? We currently have no Featured Portals (except for the Basque Portal which really isn't French any way), so how about improving Portal:France??? I don't know what's exactly wrong but the criteria can be seen at Wikipedia:Featured portal criteria.
It doesn't seem like a lot, so I hope we will still have enough problems for nexts months issue. Salut till the next issue, ChrisDHDR (17:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)).
[edit] WikiProject Newsletter n°2
It's been one high aiming month! The French WikiProject and related pages have been aiming high for Christmas - and have received an equal number of presents in return!
- The French Portal is now a Featured Portal!!! It passed its Candidacy with 100%. Special thanks go to NYArtsnWords and all those that have made this Portal work.
- The Newsletter has made it to a second issue. You can find its page at WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter and its archives at WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter/Archives.
- A new page has been setup (WikiProject France/Links) to provide an index of the Projects/Portals pages (as well as helping newbees). When creating any pages in the Project/Portal namespace, please add them to the index page. This page also give WP:FRANCE members a handy watchlist.
- As like last time, members are asked to renew their memberships at Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Members.
- I will be on holiday when the next issue is meant to come out so could some generous person(s) please do the next issue at Wikipedia:WikiProject France/Outreach/Newsletter.
Well, that's this issue. Au revoir et à bientôt till the next time, ChrisDHDR (18:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)).
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logoupmc pt.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Logoupmc pt.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:59, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Joseph Dupleix Stamp.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Joseph Dupleix Stamp.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Les Comptoirs de l'Inde.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Les Comptoirs de l'Inde.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ferg2k (talk) 15:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:GET_logo.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GET_logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Governor_General_in_Yanaon_during_1940s.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Governor_General_in_Yanaon_during_1940s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Regarding Deletion of Photos
In order to tag the images properly you really need to know the history of the image. Do you know if these images were published anywhere? There are different rules for determining copyright on images that were published or unpublished. You really need to know what year they were taken and if you know who took them or who the copyright holder is it would make it easier. See [this page] to help determine if the image is in the public domain. If it is not in the public domain, the image will have to meet all the criteria of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria to be used as fair use. If you know who the copyright holder is then you can ask them for permission to release the image under the GFDL or Creative Commons. All of this is complex and usually very difficult for historic photos, but these are the rules that have evolved on Wikipedia over time to try and avoid copyright infringement and using too many "non-free" images.
If you want me to look at an image and give you an opinion on how to tag it and if I think it will stay on Wikipedia, I can do that. Just give me the link to it and make sure you have everything you know about the image on the image description page. -Regards Nv8200p talk 02:11, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Sanskrit words and phrases category
Greetings - I am a relatively new Wikipedian and a Sanskrit student, and discovered that the vast majority of Sanskrit words and phrases had not been categorized. Therefore, I chose to take on the project of doing this. Unfortunately a few days ago, another editor decided to revert some of my additions to this category, and a dialogue with this person has proved to be fruitless.
As you are a Sanskrit expert, I am in need of assistance in determining the best additions to this category and am hoping you may be able to help in this situation. There are words and phrases that deserve to be added that this person will not accept. The current revert list appears in this person's contribution section, and included in the list are words including Apris, and I can see no reason why this should not be added. Yesterday, he deleted the word 'Sanskrit' from the list as well. Thank you for any assistance you would like to provide.--Cminard (talk) 11:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your most helpful response. I will approach the Hinduism Wikipedians on their talk page that I just located, and request their assistance regarding this matter. Nice to meet you as well.--Cminard (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Translation
Hi. I was http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shruti14&diff=218057207&oldid=217912018 requested] by another user, User:Legoktm, to translate the wikimedia:Privacy policy into Sanskrit, for the Sanskrit Wikipedia, and Sanskrit Wikibooks, but unfortunately I am unable to do so at this time. You appear to be proficient in Sanskrit, so would you be able to perform the translation? Your response would be much appreciated. Thank you. --Shruti14 t c s 02:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)