User talk:Bsnowball
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
[edit] Re:Category:Noahides
I'm not sure what to do with the article Noah's Ark, but the category can probably go. Overall, it seems a bit odd to include the sons of Noah articles, since I think that they are not really central to the denomination, but I could be wrong. --Eliyak T·C 16:07, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pundits From Pakistan
What exactly do I do apart from expanding the article to make it notable? It's a pretty well known and well appreciated book and definitely deserves to be on Wikipedia. Shobhit102 (talk) 08:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Dean Rader speedy
The article asserts at least some importance, so not a speedy. In fact, will quite possibly pass AfD. The publication of textbooks satisfies WP:PROF if they are widely used. But the publication of any book at all asserted in an article , at least the publication other than by a vanity press, isd totally sufficient to pass speedy, even if t he article will eventually be deleted by PROD or AfD. Additionally, it is considered polite to inform the author or major contributor to an article when you place any sort of deletion tag. It's not strictly speaking required, but almost everyone does it. DGG (talk) 22:20, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Drury
Tha tag is one of the classics (in my mind) - I can think of at least a thousand stubs that could get more worthy N tags if somebody really wanted - but what a waste of time - good luck to em all :( SatuSuro 10:07, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Diff - highly published - not much of the old 3rd party genuiane separate from the new age scene easily found web direct ref tho - I am sure it will be found in the end thoughSatuSuro 08:39, 11 May 2008 (UTC).
[edit] Tracy Ryan
Hi, Bsnowball. I notice that in quick succession you added and then removed the cleanup tag to the Tracy Ryan article I started yesterday. Was there a reason - is there something you think really needs to be done (but perhaps decided it wasn't strong enough for the tag)? I'm still learning here and am interested to know what I can do to make articles "clean" (besides of course more content!) Cheers, Sterry2607 (talk) 00:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks, I understand. I started using HotCat (I think that's what it's called) recently and the first time I used it I managed to delete a category that I then had to undo! Traps for young players! Yes, I decided that if it's not in any of the official biographies, I really shouldn't use it. Cheers, Sterry2607 (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] American Samoa
Hi.I believe the bot downloads data like that and it will be generated automoatically when the article is created. Right now like Fritz and Calaka I feel like leaving this site, as everytime I face the "community" I;m based with a bunch of cynics, the same type of people who tag existing articles with a speedy delete tag without proper action (I;ve just had two deletions thrown at me in a couple of minutes). I wonder why Fritz and Calaka have suddenyl said they are "busy". The actions of others on this site drive people away. I don't know why I bother to edit this site sometimes ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ $1,000,000? 10:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)