User talk:Bsam1000

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Bsam1000! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Wikipedia Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

The recent edit you made to Natalie Glebova constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —Angelo De La Paz (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Natalie Glebova. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Angelo De La Paz (talk) 23:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Natalie Glebova

Hello Angelo Paz,

See this picture http://images4.dantri.com.vn/Uploaded/thuhang/hh2141107.jpg if you care about the truth in Wikipedia. Glebova's husband according to Wikipedia is 6'1, so she is not 5'11. N. Glebova's Ethnicity is not "white", it is "Russian".

Bsam1000 (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

• I know that is a Vietnamese website. Are you Vietnamese? And one more time, please read some Wikipedia rules (especially WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:3RR) before your every edit. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Re" Incorrect information about N. Glebova's height

Hello Angelo,

No I am not Vietnamese. The above picture of Natalie Glebova and her husband should be from a Thai site (Natalie Glebova lives in Thailand). You are more knowledgeable about this, so you can correct it. I didn't want to irritate anybody by reverting it, I thought that this would alert you that the information was incorrect. All the stuff about this edits seems very complicated. But from now on I will have doubts when using Wikipedia for research. Who knows how many other things are incorrect...

Thanks,

Bsam1000 (talk) 23:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia's verifiability policy states that the standard is verifiability, not truth — meaning, in this context, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. Furthermore there is a no original research policy, which means that a comparison of two peoples heights is not enough to verify her height. PageantUpdater talk • contribs 23:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)