User talk:Bronayur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Bronayur! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 02:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] WikiProject Binghamton proposal

I have made a proposal for a WikiProject for articles relating to Binghamton/Greater Binghamton/Triple Cities. You have edited a Binghamton related article(s). If you are interested in supporting the proposal (or not), you can view it, leave a comment and/or add your name as a potential member at:

WikiPedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Binghamton

Cheesebox 08:00, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Manual Therapy vs Massage

Hi, I noticed that you redirected manual therapy to massage. I have undone this as massage is just one type of manual therapy, as the original article clearly stated. If you want to change an article in such a dramatic way, please discuss this on the article 'talk' page first. Thanks.Davwillev 20:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry for the copyvio accusations

I'm really, really sorry about falsely accusing you of cutting-and pasting. I wasn't looking at the diffs closely enough. I need to be more careful in examining diffs. However, in the future if someone reverts an edit and gives a reason in the edit summary, it's not a good idea to just revert it back (it made it appear as if you were ignoring my warning), but rather, post a comment on my page first or the talk page (e.g., "Hey, why did you revert my stuff? Show me where I cut and paste?"), or even just mention in the edit summary that I was mistaken. (Using edit summaries in general is considered good practice in Wikipedia). Still, 90% my fault. Carry on the good work. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:07, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

As long as what you're adding is in your own words, don't worry about finding other copyright violations. It's very possible that some of the identifical content I found on other sites was copied from Wikipedia (which is actually legal). OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nice work

Thanks for using edit summaries. It's really helpful when you're looking over an article's history. Cheers, OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:52, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for taking the time to learn about Wikipedia guidelines and the "manual of style" while adding well-written and sourced content! OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:34, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] massage categories

I think you are going overboard with the massage categories. Just because the word "massage" appears in the article that doesn't mean the article belongs in that category. Maybe you should put in a little more thought into which ones you add. Ospinad 19:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] hi Bronayur

You wrote me a messege,

Hi there I see you are interested in massage if you would like to come over and help out that would be great.

I did not understand your messege and what you mean..--Astrolog 10:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your help

Image:WikiThanks.png Thanks for reverting vandalism on Larrys Creek on October 19. I appreciate your help keeping the article presentable while it was Today's Featured Article very much, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 19:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Indian Head Massage

I see you have a history of working on the article Indian Head Massage. I am looking at it from the project Wikipedia:Unreferenced articles where it is one of the longest {{unreferenced}} tagged articles that does not meet at least the barest minimum of verifiability. It has been tagged and completely without references since June 2006. It would be extremely helpful if you had some references you could add to the article to help support its verifiability and notability. Thanks for any help you can give. BirgitteSB 21:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I will look into this...Keep up the good work!Bronayur (talk) 00:02, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your dispute with the neutrality of the ACIM article

Dear Bronayer,

You've inserted the disputed-neutrality template on the ACIM page, but you seem to have not given any rationale for doing so on the article's talk page. Could you please explain your reasoning for inserting this template on the same article's talk page?

Thanks,

Scott P. (talk) 04:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)