User talk:Brommyefc
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Impressed with your speed
 |
The Running Man Barnstar | |
| Less than 10 minutes after Matthew Taylor's goal and you'd posted a description on Wiki - congratulations! Also good sportsmanship award considering it was against your team! For both these, I would like you to have a Barnstar - there isn't a football one, the general sports one is the closest I could get. Good luck for the rest of the season, and happy editing. Hyperman 42 01:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC) |
[edit] Notability of Robert Earl (businessman)
A tag has been placed on Robert Earl (businessman), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Kevinkor2 00:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Harchesterunited.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Harchesterunited.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] September 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cristiano Ronaldo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — jacĸrм ( talk | sign ) 22:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:TakeThat.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:TakeThat.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
