User talk:Brmuchim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:IMS.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IMS.JPG. The copy called Image:IMS.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 19:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Repost of Issaquah Middle School

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Issaquah Middle School, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Issaquah Middle School was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Issaquah Middle School, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 03:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Issaquah Middle School

I have no doubt of the school's existence. I exist too, but an article on me would not be appropriate. The concern raised at the deletion discussion was a lack of notability, that is, a lack of substantial sourcing which is both reliable and written by someone not affiliated with the subject. As the article was sourced exclusively to the school's website (a non-independent source) and someone's Comcast homepage (an unreliable source), it did not address the concern for which the article was previously deleted. Can you point me to some substantial, reliable, independent sourcing? If so, I'd be happy to restore the article and to help you add such sourcing if you can, but articles are not simply for a list of trivia and minutiae (bell times, volunteer responsibilities) that no independent source has taken note of. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 03:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't see it. The sourcing is reliable enough, but is not substantial, one source is simply a collection of statistics and one mentions it only in passing. Perhaps you might wish to consider putting a few lines on it into the school district article, or starting or adding to a list of schools in the district? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 23:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)