User talk:Brittainia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Brittainia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  William M. Connolley 17:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 3RR warning

Please be aware of WP:3RR William M. Connolley 17:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

Thank you for taking notice in William M. Connolley's abuse of Wikipedia's policies. For others, I've created an advisory board. ~ UBeR 20:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank you for the Barnstar

It is nice to know people are reading my entries. I simply want the science, include the uncertainties, to be properly understood. RonCram 19:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] I am being reviewed

Hello, friend. I'd like to inform you of the attacks and claims made by Raul654 to the administrator noticeboard regarding my actions. I whole heartedly believe my actions are just and warranted. Please review the current situation. Thank you. ~ UBeR 23:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Global Warming skeptic userbox

Thought you might be interested in having a userbox on your user page that expresses your skepticism of anthropogenic global warming. It looks like this and will also add you to Category:Wikipedians who are skeptical of anthropogenic global warming. If you're interested, put the following on your user page:

{{User:Oren0/GWSkeptic}}

Feel free to tell your friends. Thanks! Oren0 21:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Global warming debate

Hello. IntelligenceSquared held an interesting debate on Global Warming. Based on the votes of the audience, those who said it was not a crisis won the debate. I thought you might be interesting in reading about it. [1]RonCram 17:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks. I read the transcript. It was quite interesting, though Gavin Schmidt was rather embarrassing. --JonGwynne 02:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Connolley using Wikipedia to blog?

One administrator thinks so. ~ UBeR 23:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arguing against the notion of anthropogenic global warming makes you a conspiracy theorist?

According to this article you are. Vote to delete this nonsense here. Quite obviously the article violates notability (a few journalist may have classified it as such), NPOV, verifiability (few sources actually concurring with the article), and POV forking. If you wish to disregard those who disagree with you, fine. Labeling them as conspiracy theorists is nonsense. ~ UBeR 05:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion on Scientific data archiving

Please take a look at this Talk page, especially the part on "pseudoscience" and William's reverts. The POV of certain editors is preventing them from objectively dealing with the facts. The concepts involved are not difficult but they do take a little investment of time to understand. You may need to spend some time in the Pseudoscience article to be fully comfortable. I hope you are able to find the time to help out. Thanks! RonCram 15:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] WP:COI Violations?

Brittainia, I am trying to get more information to see if it is a Conflict of Intrest violation for an Environmental Activist/Green Party member to be actavly editing pages that have to do with Environmental issues. Your thoughts?--Zeeboid 17:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked for 48 hours for violating the 3RR on Global warming in conjunction with User:Rameses. Checkuser has previously established that both accounts are being run by the same person, so they are being treated as the same account. --Akhilleus (talk) 01:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)