User talk:Brianjd
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
| Archives |
| About archives • Edit this box |
[edit] Singapore Airlines
I have been editing airline articles in Wikipedia for some time now, and my edits are according to the Wikiproject style. This style of course doesn't have to be used, but when looking at airlines such as American Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Continental Airlines, United Airlines, etc, you will notice not only myself, but other editors have helped me implement a consistent style. Once again, it is soley my opinion on how the airline articles should be layed out. Most Star Alliance airline articles do have the style I utilize, as I have edited many of them some time before. All SkyTeam articles also have this style as well. That is why I try not to edit international airlines too often because the way I edit them is usually not the way many people want them. But, as I have discussed with many editors of this article, it needs serious attention. My edits were reasonable, but I understand that I dont necassarily describe them as much as I should. I really think the edits I made were well overdue.--Golich17 00:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- I searched some old revisions of the Singapore Airlines talk page, and found nothing relevant. I searched some old revisions of your talk page and the only relevant item I found was a comment asking you to move sections in one edit and use better edit summaries. In both cases, the lists, which for me contain 200 revisions, go back to 2006. I have no idea what that massive paragraph above is about, except for "I understand that I dont necassarily describe them as much as I should", nor can I understand why this section is called "Singapore Airlines". Brian Jason Drake 05:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Merge idiot code?
You placed merge tags, but no discussion. Since I couldn't imagine what you had in mind, there being nothing there to merge, I took out the tags. Dicklyon (talk) 07:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Eau Claire City Council
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Eau Claire City Council, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Eau Claire City Council.
Horrid turn-out, easily merged, imo :-) Xavexgoem (talk) 04:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
