Talk:British and Irish Communist Organisation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Errors
As someone who was a British member of B&ICO, I felt the need to correct the more obvious errors in the piece. I've a feeling there was a Jim Lane who was an ICO member, though it may not be the same fellow. He is definitely not the same person as Jack Lane, any more than Colin Powell is Enoch Powell.
Some of the other comments are no better informed, though I accept them as honest errors from someone who was trying to fill in the gaps.
What I've left unchanges isn't necessarily accurate, just I'm not going to undertake to write the definitive history. More important is the massive neglect of Workers' Control, the big missed opportunity of the 1970s.
I have however added and linked to the Dublin Housing Action Committee, which every Irish leftists alive at the time likes to have on their CV. As is documented in the links for that page, the Secretary and leading spirit was Dennis Dennehy, a founder-member who later left. His own history is very interesting, but I am not qualified to write it.
--GwydionM 17:48, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Criticism
Given their rather abrupt changes of view, I think a criticism section would be appropriate - where would be the best source to start with for this? Autarch 19:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- You might consider the possibility that abrupt changes of view are related to abrupt changes in the world. Notably the Soviet collapse of 1989-91. Also the collapse of the first power-sharing in 1974 and the apparent success of the latest round. --GwydionM 17:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
-
- What I've seen of their writings about that period claims that their change of view was due to a collapse of the nationalist position in the Republic, rather than the collapse of the Soviet Union. (In fact, there's at least one webpage - a reprint of a 1975 publication that denies that they are a Marxist organisation.here) Some of the changes are across the Nationalist/Unionist divide, suggesting a local reason. Autarch 19:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Communist Comment 040770r.jpg
Image:Communist Comment 040770r.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:57, 29 October 2007 (UTC)