Talk:British Rail Class 458

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
Low Importance: low within UK Railways WikiProject.
This article is within the scope of the Passenger trains task force.

Why "British Rail Class 458"? British Rail had nothing to do with these units. They were a product of the post-privatisation era. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.10.72.38 (talk • contribs) 11:21, November 30, 2005.

it's a common page name format for all TOPS numbered classes that run and have run on the UK mainland (and Isle of Wight) main rail network, whether pre-or-post privitisation. It ensures that, say, if there was a class 459 in the future, that the page name wouldn't have been taken by a class of boat, or a train class in another country, or whatever. Cambridge al (talk) 20:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Diagrams?

I take it this is railway jargon for service patterns or something? Can someone clarify exactly what this phrase means to the layman, please. Jonobennett

Yes, a diagram is basically a service pattern. A working diagram could say, for example, waterloo to reading, then return, then to weymouth, then return etc. (That's not a real one, by the way). They're basically what services the trains run and in what order they do so. Hope this helps :-)

82.40.75.55 11:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Conversion to 25 kV AC

What do they currently run on?

750V DC Third Rail Willkm 12:22, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] rewrite

The article is all over the place re: when the trains have been used and/or withdrawn. Can someone rearrange it all into a coherent narrative? --Dtcdthingy 22:08, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm removing the information about their being withdrawn, they are definitely still in service. I saw one at work only this morning.HonestTom 17:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

They will probably be withdrawn fully in the near future though 82.40.75.55 11:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Corridor connection

Does anyone know if there are any photos available online of the corridor connection in use? I am aware they are rarely used due to their complexity, but it would be interesting to see exactly how they work. 82.40.75.55 11:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)