Talk:British Rail Class 334
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. | ||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Railways.
|
||
 |
This article is within the scope of the Passenger trains task force. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the Transport in Scotland WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of transportation in Scotland. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| Start | This page has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. |
[edit] Facts
Please check your facts before posting on this article. I had to fix a few things this morning.
There were always 40 Junipers.
Sources: http://www.spt.co.uk/rail/juniper.html
I've also tidied up the announcement system to reflect what she actually says. If you don't know, don't make it up.
Thanks.
> The announcement system is not able to display tailed letters on screen and instead uses capitals. [eg luGGaGe]
Who the hell is doctor flange?!
This is actually almost true. Due to the size, sentances like "We are now approaching Ayr" appear as "We are now aPProachin9 AYr". The PIS screens are not big enough to show the tailed letters properly. 82.40.75.55 12:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Announcements - does anyone know why some say "Please change here for Gartnavel Hospital", and some say "Please alight here for Gartnavel hospital"? Talking train woman firmware can't deal with the difference? User misconfiguration? Gordonjcp (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Unreliability
In what way are the 334's so unreliable.
Mainly because they are new trains, they are unrelianle :-D
I believe there have been technical difficulties with the fleet.
82.40.75.55 21:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Currently, I would state that the 334's are MORE common on the North Clyde line than the 320. Panthro 18:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
??? Not actually true, although they can appear to be more common during peak times. In fact, 320s can only operate on the North Clydes at the moment, so using more 334s would be a stupid idea. 77.97.28.34 (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
