Talk:British Caledonian in the 1970s

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AVIATION This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
The article British Caledonian in 1977 was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 28 February 2008 with a consensus to merge the content into British Caledonian in the 1970s. If the merger is not completed promptly, British Caledonian in 1977 might be re-nominated for deletion.

To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

The article British Caledonian in 1978 was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 28 February 2008 with a consensus to merge the content into British Caledonian in the 1970s. If the merger is not completed promptly, British Caledonian in 1978 might be re-nominated for deletion.

To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

The article British Caledonian in 1979 was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on 28 February 2008 with a consensus to merge the content into British Caledonian in the 1970s. If the merger is not completed promptly, British Caledonian in 1979 might be re-nominated for deletion.

To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.

[edit] Multiple Issues

Have removed the tags because most of these aren't justified in my opinion. Contrary to whomsoever inserted these tags, the article isn't a mere reflection of the author's opinion and I also don't find it confusing. For a start, the author has provided plenty of references that are verifiable. Reading through these establishes that what he/she has written here largely reflects what has been stated in the source material, expressed in the author's own words. As far as the lack of context is concerned, this will become clear when referring back to the main British Caledonian article, as this article is a continuation and further elaboration of the former that contains many additional facts about the airline. And, what does the person who put the tag mean by an "airline expert". Are these the people who have written other aviation-related articles for publication in Wikipedia that seem to be written by plane spotters for plane spotters? I feel one of the good things about this article, which I agree is far from perfect, is precisely that it stresses the commercial context rather than merely being a description of an airline company that flew X number of planes from Y to Z. The only criticism contained in these which I consider justified is that the introductory para could be expanded. ttd_369 13:05, 4 March 2008 (GMT)