Talk:Bristol Beaufort

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Aircraft WikiProject

I have to thank the Bristol Beaufort for my very existence. My father, W/Cdr C V (Micky) Ogden was a test pilot for Bristol Aeroplane Company at Filton from 1934 to 1941. He left Bristol's on 15th November 1941 after a 20 minute flight in a Beaufort no 290 which had an engine failure on takeoff. Some six weeks earlier, he had tested a Beaufort which had an engine failure on takeoff. At that time, the Beaufort had apparently entered squadron service with a defect in that when an engine failed there was no way of feathering the airscrew. Fuel continued to be sucked into the engine and then petrol vapour penetrated into the fuselage and then there was a spark and Boom! At least 6 test pilots had been killed because of this and my father could have been the 7th. He had a furious row with Uwins, the Chief Test Pilot, in October and when he flew on 15th November, Micky assumed the problem had been fixed. It hadn't. He had a furious row again with Uwins and Micky decided he was safer in the RAF.

On 23rd November, my father rejoined the RAF as a Flight Lieutenant at No2 OTU Catfoss and subsequently flew the Beaufighter with 272 squadron in the Western Desert. You can read the account of his his first flight at Catfoss on 23rd November 1941 in Desert Squadron by Victor Houart available via www.bookfinder.com My father died on 21st October 2002. A great man and wartime hero. He was my hero.

Michael Ogden

[edit] Named after

Is the Beaufort named after anyone in particular. eg Francis Beaufort given the nautical connection? the Buckingham could be the Duke of B. as with the Blenheim , Beaufighter is presumably the "Beau" out of Beaufort + "fighter". GraemeLeggett 15:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

As far as I know, it was the result of the pan-British aircraft name alliteration campaign. Not named after anyone in particular, they just needed a "B" word. :) - Emt147 ^Burninate! 21:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Except British naming is more complex than that. There is a tendency towards alliteration eg "Handley Page Halifax" but the 4 engineed bombers where named after towns and cities hence Short Stirling (alliterative) but also Avro Lancaster. The Hawkers are H's for a while H. Hart, but after Hurricane take a meterological turn, Typhoon, Tempest (which also fits in with the Westland Whirlwind). Supermarine Spitfire but also Supermarine Walrus which matches stylewise with Fairey Swordfish etc. The predecessor to the Beaufort, the Blenheim fits with HP Hampden (Palace) but Beaufort if named after the seafaring gentleman fits with Avro Anson (after the Admiral) another maritime plane. It would be an interesting article if the acutal naming rules could be accurately summarised. GraemeLeggett 08:43, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

I am aware of people attempting to, but any rationalisation seems swamped by exceptions. The latest addition of Aeroplane includes some comments about names, how they replaced letters and numbers (BE2, 504, SE5), and have not always been given, (VC10).Winstonwolfe 04:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)