Talk:Brighton Grammar School

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Schools This article is related to WikiProject Schools, an attempt to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Schools Portal
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-Importance within Schools.
Flag
Portal
 Brighton Grammar School is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne.
This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Australia.
Assessment comments

Contents

[edit] Assess

It needs photos and references. I have done one ref for you. This is an important article. Fix the POV issues and reapply for a B assessment. Victuallers 10:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

 This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.
Discussion of this nomination can be found on the talk page. (December 2007)

:

[edit] POV Problems

 This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality.
Discussion of this nomination can be found on the talk page. (December 2007)

.

Contains wholly unchecked glowing praise of too many people and things.

[edit] Other

This article is related to the WikiProject Melbourne. This Project is an attempt to fill in, organise, and standardise articles about the city of Melbourne, Australia.
You can discuss the Project at its talk page, or see a list of open tasks here.

[edit] Significance

This seems to be a fairly significant school. Alas, I was unable to find much on the Web about it - hopefully some alum will fill in more detail, listing significant alumni, etc. Noel (talk) 18:58, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Brighton POV

I believe that the reverts of User:Finneganw are maintaining a very pro-Brighton message, containing information that is both unencylopedic, and ultimately boring to anyone not associated with the school. Twenty Years 14:50, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Exactly my feelings. Just because something is verifiable, doesn't make it worthy of inclusion (and the info that has been added has no ref anyway so I fail to see how it is verifiable). The 'Director of Activities' and 'Deputy Head (Curriculum)' are hardly notable people and therefore I fail to see why the should be discussed. Lets stick to information (with references) that is written from a neutral point of view and actually adds something to the article. Loopla (talk) 00:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)