Talk:Brightcove

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Updates

Since I have a COI I'm putting any references related to updates in this talk page and someone else can integrate it into the article. This includes both new news and external references for old news. --Eddroid 18:37, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] References

  1. ^ "Site will cater to offbeat films", http://www.news.com/, 2005-03-22. 
  2. ^ "Brightcove makes purchase to bolster Web video", http://www.news.com/, 2006-03-19. 
  3. ^ "Brightcove opens IPTV service to public", http://www.news.com/, 2006-04-27. 
  4. ^ "Warner Music Group partners with Internet video service", http://www.news.com/, 2006-10-26. 
  5. ^ "Brightcove aims to create video marketplace", http://www.news.com/, 2006-10-29. 
  6. ^ "Wetpaint Offers Software-as-Service Package", http://publications.mediapost.com/, 2007-12-11. 
  7. ^ "Net video firm Brightcove reels in $59 million", http://www.news.com/, 2007-1-17. 
  8. ^ "Microsoft sheds light on Flash rival", http://www.news.com/, 2007-04-15. 
  9. ^ "File-sharing pirates attempt new software standard", http://ca.today.reuters.com/, 2007-11-06. 
  10. ^ Go Sox, Go Boston.com. http://blog.brightcove.com/ (2007-10-26).
  11. ^ Tell HBO you love their new show. http://blog.brightcove.com/ (2007-11-26).
  12. ^ Members of the Writers Guild of America Launch "Speechless" Campaign with Brightcove. http://blog.brightcove.com/ (2007-11-26).
  13. ^ Brightcove.TV and Consumer Video Uploads. http://blog.brightcove.com/ (2007-11-27).
  14. ^ "Brightcove.tv pulls plug on user-generated video", http://www.news.com/, 2007-11-27. (English) 
  15. ^ "Brightcove closes consumer doors. What happens to Aftermix?", http://blogs.zdnet.com/, 2007-11-27. (English) 
  16. ^ "Brightcove.TV Gets Its Plug Pulled (Sort Of)", http://www.techcrunch.com/, 2007-11-27. (English) 
  17. ^ BrightCove.TV Shuts Down; Company to Follow?. http://mashable.com/ (2007-11-27).
  18. ^ Jeremy Allaire Sounds Off on Internet Video Market & Offers Predictions for 2008. http://blog.brightcove.com/ (2007-11-28).
  19. ^ Internet TV Platforms Come of Age. http://www.brightcove.com/ (2007-11-28).
  20. ^ Brightcove Misses the Point of Business: Make Money. http://mashable.com/ (2007-11-29).
  21. ^ Response to Mashable comments on Internet TV Platforms Come of Age. http://blog.brightcove.com/ (2007-11-30).
  22. ^ "UK Broadcaster Channel 4 Announces Company-Wide Deal with Brightcove", http://blog.brightcove.com/, 2007-07-12. (English) 
  23. ^ (2007-11-29). "Channel 4 Teams With Brightcove To Launch Promotional Internet Video Channels". Press release.
  24. ^ "Channel 4 and Brightcove to launch promotional video channels", http://www.cbronline.com, 2007-12-03. 

[edit] Question about above updates

Eddroid, so I and others are clear - is it your intention that all of these be worked into the article somehow? I'm not sure how all of these are "encyclopedic" if you take my meaning. I think this is part of why the article was getting so bloated. We really want to avoid adding every company happening or press release to the article. The article should be more of a comprehensive summary of major historical events than a detailed list. Make sense? --Spike Wilbury talk 22:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay in my response. Since I've resolved not to touch the main article anymore, my intention is that these updates be used as 3rd-party external sources for events mentioned in the main article which are only referenced by the Brightcove Blog. This follows Neil's revision comment that all self-references be removed. If some news is considered "un-encyclopedic", then I would recommend removing the mention from the main article and the associated 3rd-party mention from this list. --Eddroid (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Declined G11

I've declined the G11 put on this article at 15:25, June 6, 2008 by 194.74.202.254 and worked on improving the article. Much of it reads like a series of press releases (and appears to be cited to exactly that); this should be fixed. I removed quite a bit of material that I don't feel is very useful to the article. A few other things I did were useful fixes and such, so please do not simply revert me. Cheers. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:05, 6 June 2008 (UTC)