Talk:Brighella

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think whoever wrote this article didn't do much research. Especially where it says Brighella's plans were "foiled by their own ineptitude." Quite the contrary -- Brighella's plans traditionally are very workable and clever, and it's usually luck alone that will cause them to be foiled. I think in a day or two I will expand this article a little, and I expect that if no one has objections or evidence for me, I'll take out that line while I'm at it. --Sobekneferu 07:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Don't know who it was that apparently changed Fenocchio to 'Ben' or why that happened, but I fixed it. If there is a character with similar traits to Fenocchio who is named Ben, Duchartre didn't mention him, and there would be no reason to remove Fenocchio from the list.--68.35.94.119 23:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

It was most likely vandalism. It happens. It's just up to us to act as custodians of the articles. Thanks for being the one to catch this time.IanThal 23:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Scapino

There seems to be enough material on the character of Scapino to justify either a separate section or even a separate article. What do people think?IanThal 19:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

I think Scapino well merits his own article (but then again, I'm the one who wrote his article, so...) Still, I think there is enough information to make him separate -- especially if someone's willing to sit down and really do an hour or two of research! -- and certainly there are more minor characters than poor Scapin on Wikipedia who get their own articles without complaint. --Sobekneferu 22:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Now, does anyone else think it strange that someone appears to have copy/pasted Scapino's article right into the middle of Brighella's? I can't seem to get rid of it, but it shouldn't be there, and especially not as long as Scapino's separate article still stands.--Sobekneferu 22:15, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Once again, here I am -- I fixed it. --Sobekneferu 22:16, 31 May 2007 (UTC)