Talk:Brigham Young University–Idaho
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||||||||||||
 Archives |
|
Contents |
[edit] Discussion
I edited a lot of the vandalism that occurred on this page. People made various smart alec comments related to their discontent with how the university is run, as well as the student body, and several stereotypes. I would recommend at least a temporary semi-protection on this page. Aedtl 09:40, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The latest enrollment for Fall 2006 was over 13,000 students198.60.98.100 18:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
I removed the emphasis from "not affiliated" because it seemed to push too much on an issue that most people will be completely unfamiliar with. In fact I think that whole sentence should be reworded to say what BYU-I is, not what it is not. If I don't get any flack on that issue, I'll do so. Salzgitter 14:59, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
I expanded the paragraph on the Honor Code and made it into a separate section. It would be nice if someone started a section on the school's "Rethinking Education" philosophy (of which the three-track system is part). --Kingofthesystem 07:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
I was both pleased and disappointed coming back to this page a few months later. Pleased, because so much information and pictures had been added. Disappointed, because these additions had completely replaced the old article. Normally, I would not care (as improving articles is what Wikipedia is about), but the new article read like an advertisement (it was posted by BYU-Idaho Public Relations), avoided probing deeply into the Honor/Dress Codes, etc. Mostly, I cut and pasted parts from the old version (Feb 22 2006) that would balance the new one (with some editing to make these changes flow).--Kingofthesystem 02:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
BYU-I is a college not an University as per Websters definition of university. "an institution of higher learning providing facilities for teaching and research and authorized to grant academic degrees; specifically : one made up of an undergraduate division which confers bachelor's degrees and a graduate division which comprises a graduate school and professional schools each of which may confer master's degrees and doctorates" It retains University in its name because of its association with BYU-Provo. TimothyDOConnor 8:30, March 5, 2007
- I agree it doesn't fit Webster's definition, but the actual definition of what consitutes a "university" and what is a "college" is actually not legally defined in the United States (see College). Boston College is a prime example as it is really a full-fledged university, but chose to keep the "College" part of its name rather than add "University" and either change the name further (to differentiate from Boston University) or just be confused with BU. Schools with "college" are also typically liberal arts colleges, which BYU-Idaho really doesn't fit either. It also depends on each state too what can be classified a "college" or "university." But I agree the association with BYU is really the biggest reason it has "university" status. It gave BYU-Idaho almost instant accreditation. --JonRidinger 03:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Brigham Young University-Idaho medallion logo.png
Image:Brigham Young University-Idaho medallion logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:28, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Quality
Is it me or is this article of very poor quality? It reads like a brochure straight from the university rather than an encyclopedic article. I almost feel like the whole thing needs to be re-written! Any ideas where to start? --JonRidinger 03:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- It's not you. BYU's article was pretty bad to before I started fixing it up, but not this bad. Wrad (talk) 04:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Good ideas...will see what I can add and improve. --JonRidinger (talk) 06:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Removed Text
I removed the following text, as it has had a citation tag since Nov. 2007:
[edit] Faculty
 |
This section does not cite any references or sources. (November 2007) Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed. |
BYU–Idaho employs approximately 470 faculty members. Instructors are engaged in a wide range of scholarly activities, but the faculty’s primary focus is on the teaching and development of students. The school maintains a low student to faculty ratio, and there is no faculty rank.
Please do not put the text back on the page without pertinent references. Thank you. --Eustress (talk) 21:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] BYU-I Userbox
Just wanted to let everyone know that I created a userbox for BYU-I students and alumni. Simply type {{User BYU-Idaho}} on your userpage and enjoy! --Eustress (talk) 23:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Ricks College
I have been thinking that perhaps it might be better to spin off a separate Ricks College article. BYU-Idaho is obviously a continuation of Ricks, but before and after the transition are two very different times, not only in regards to athletics, but activities, academics, and the campus itself. I've noticed as I've edited this page there are frequent "before the transition" or "after the transition"...Thoughts on this? Just something to think about. Obviously we would keep the history together, but we could take out the "before and after" stuff reflecting the current school on the BYU-Idaho article and the Ricks College "way it was" on a separate page. Or perhaps a better way to integrate the two here?? --JonRidinger (talk) 02:41, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- You could have some kind of Main article link for the History section (using the {{main}} template with Brigham Young University-Idaho history) that goes more in depth regarding Ricks, but that's as drastic a move as I would suggest, and it's something you could compile now and then create later and possibly get into DYK. I like how concise the history section in this article is right now. --Eustress (talk) 04:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Intro
There's been some back-and-forth editing on the intro, so I'm hoping we can discuss it a little if there are future edits. I've done the following:
- Bolded appropriate titles in the Intro (per WP:LEAD) to include its current name and acronyms, along with the most notable prior name (Ricks College)—bolding all the prior names is too much
- Put the acronyms in parentheses per WP:LEAD
- Made the Intro a bit more concise, moving text into two paragraphs; this section currently doesn't merit three paragraphs, as a paragraph should usually embody at least three sentences
Please discuss any objections to these bullets or significant changes regarding the lead here first. Thanks. --Eustress (talk) 04:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- The paragraphs also need to make logical sense. This is why I have placed the statement about the percentage of students who are LDS with relevant material. It is a noteworthy fact, but hardly one that should be put even before the mentioning of the history of the school and CES and BYU and how BYU-Idaho fits into that.
- I don't have a problem with three paragraphs, but I don't think it's that big of a deal either. --JonRidinger (talk) 06:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- As you can see I rewrote some stuff because there were some missing facts (like what did BYU-Idaho transition from?) and I do think BYU-Hawaii and the LDS Business College need to be mentioned as sister schools if BYU is mentioned since it shows the relationship between the four and how BYU-Idaho fits in. I reworded some of the history section in the opening so that it flowed better and so I could combine what had been the first two paragraphs into one. Once again I moved the fact about 99.7% of the students being Mormon to the end, not because it is the least significant fact, but because it lends support to the statement that precedes it in the current setup: "...almost all of whom are members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints." --JonRidinger (talk) 06:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
As far as the mentioning of the other CES schools, yes one can go to the CES article, but CES includes more than just the 3 BYU's and LDSBC, so showing how it is part of a particular system (in this case a system within a system) would include mentioning at least BYU and BYU-Hawaii since they share a common name and the fact that the BYU name is well-known to most people (but most don't realize there are two other schools with the BYU name). Next, BYU-Idaho's relation to BYU is the same as its relationship to BYU-Hawaii and LDSBC (sister schools) which is why I think they should be mentioned and the relation clarified: BYU-Idaho has three sister schools. Too many people assume that BYU-Idaho is a dependent branch campus of BYU (like BYU-Idaho students will eventually have to transfer to BYU to finish their coursework). Even though I did support using the term flagship to refer to BYU, since it isn't used, the wording certainly makes it appear that way as the paragraph mentions BYU-Idaho's relationship to BYU and then mentions the other two's relation to BYU not BYU-Idaho. Believe me, if there were more sister schools besides the other three I wouldn't favor listing all of them.--JonRidinger (talk) 17:47, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
