Talk:Brian Moore (politician)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brian Moore (politician) article.
Article policies
This page is about an active politician who is running for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some political conflict or controversy.

Because of this, this article is at risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
This article is within the scope of the United States presidential elections WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States presidential elections-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Contents

[edit] Categories

Yeah, I know I'm a lazy bastard, but if someone could fix the category now that we know his year of birth, that would be great.

KV(Talk) 21:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wanted Information

I will be interviewing Brian Moore tomorrow, if anyone has any questions they think should be covered, please post. The interview is an obvious potential source for the article, documented and thus not OR. KV(Talk) 21:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Colbert

Why does this TV fancruft get a section all to itself? The Wednesday Island (talk) 02:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

I think it should be moved to another section, calling it something like 2008 election, to distinguish it from his other biographical data. I'm also wondering why its not mentioned that this guy used to be a republican. He's jumped from democratic to green party/indie to republican than all the sudden a socialist. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 09:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Wow I'm that tired I see. Thats already the name of the section. What I must in fact be proposing is that we move all relevant data about his campaign into that section. After I wake up, of course. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 09:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
I went ahead and took care of it. I'm no good at writing but at least its NPOV. I suppose we just need more info on his campaign. I didn't see any while doing a google search. I'm beginning to think this guy is only notable for losing elections. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 09:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] How much info on embarassing associates should be in a presidential candidate's biography?

The Barack Obama Featured Article, part of this project's scope, now has an important discussion on its talk page (at Talk:Barack Obama#Attempt to build consensus on the details) that could affect other articles, including this one, on other presidential candidates. There is already talk on that page that the articles on other presidential candidates may need to be changed, so editors involved in this article may want to get involved with the discussion there.

Some editors here think that when a U.S. presidential candidate is embarassed by someone associated with that candidate, no information about it should be mentioned in the WP biography article, even if the campaign (and therefore the person who is the subject of the article) was affected. Others think WP should only mention that this person was controversial and leave a link in the article to the WP article on that controversial associate. Still others (including me), think we should briefly explain just why that person was controversial in the candidate's life, which can be done in a phrase or at most a sentence or two. Examples:

Whatever we do, we should have equal treatment, so anyone interested in NPOV-, WP:BLP-compliant articles should look at and participate in the discussion. We've started the discussion by focusing on how much to say about former Weather Underground leader Bill Ayers in the Barack Obama article, but, again, this will likely affect many other articles.

If you click on the first link I give here, you'll find a comparison I did of negative information in the Clinton, McCain and Giuliani articles. I've also posted that information on the talk pages of those articles. In that discussion (and at the McCain, Clinton and Giuliani talk pages), I've also posted a comparison of what negative information is presented on each candidate, especially in relation to associates who give the candidates bad publicity. I think editors of this article would find the comparison useful. Noroton (talk) 17:12, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

On some other pages where I've posted this, people have been responding only beneath the post, which is fine, but won't help get a consensus where it counts. So please excuse me for raising my voice, just to make sure I get the point across: Please respond at Talk:Barack Obama#Attempt to build consensus on the details where your comments will actually affect the consensus!!! Sorry for the shoutin', won't do it again (here, anyway). Noroton (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)