Talk:Brian Lang

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Science and academia work group.

Contents 1 Category -- Academics of the University? 2 FRSE? 3 Harassment case 4 References etc. 5 Name

[edit] Category -- Academics of the University?

Should he really be in this category -- he's an administrator, not an academic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.131.159 (talk) 14:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

No. He hasn't been an academic for 30 years. Yes, he is principal of a university, but you wouldn't say the CEO of an engineering firm is an engineer! If there are no objections, I am going to remove this acrticle from that category. 217.42.132.52 (talk) 08:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FRSE?

I vaguely remember reading about a few people complaining when he was made an FRSE -- didn't some existing Fellows protest that he was getting it ex officio for being principal of a Scottish university instead of for any noteworthy intellectual achievement? Can't remember where I saw it -- maybe The Herald. Perhaps someone who has access to their archives or someone at the RSE can find a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.24.5 (talk) 18:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harassment case

An anonymous user deleted details of the harassment accusations, with the edit summary "removed misleading statement". The statements in question are properly sourced and seem to form a fair summary of the events as recounted in the source. So I have reverted the edit. If there are more details of the case that should be mentioned, please add them (with sources). KarenSutherland (talk) 20:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

I've temporarily removed this claim from the article: "The employment tribunal did not proceed after Mrs McGonigle unreservedly withdrew her case for unfair dismissal and issued a statement through her solicitor admitting that she had never made any allegations of sexual harassment or intimidation against Lang." This is not backed up by a source and could be a libel against McGonigle, since it basically asserts that she made a malicious allegation. I'm going off to hunt for a source for this. If it's literally true, presumably Lang sued McGonigle for slander -- that must be reported somewhere. 217.42.131.212 (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, there aren't many matches on Google for "brian lang" mcgonigle. With the sources we've got is this [1] (about the initial allegations) and this [2] (scroll down) (apparently about some related incident about leaking student records), plus a few others that, like, summarize what we know. Because we haven't got sources, I don't think that statement can go back in the article. Yes, the tribunal didn't go ahead, so the settlement must have involved the formal allegations being withdrawn. I'll put in a short phrase about that. 217.42.131.212 (talk) 11:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Done 217.42.131.212 (talk) 11:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I think that's a good decision. Obviously this whole issue is very sensitive and we need to be careful about not going beyond what the sources tell us. We know (a) there were accusations of harassment, (b) a settlement was reached "minutes before" the court case. Strictly speaking, whether or not the allegations were withdrawn depends on whether the settlement involved Laing admitting wrongdoing. From context, I suspect they were withdrawn, so I think we should leave that statement in, but add a citation needed tag. KarenSutherland (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] References etc.

I've added two general references to cover most of the points in the article -- this article was almost completely unsourced. I can't find a reference to the thing about him being a visiting scholar at Napier Unversity. Indeed, Napier University doesn't seem to have a "Department of Communication and Media"! I've tagged this point. KarenSutherland (talk) 16:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I have gotten rid of the Napier statement and the other tagged statement (see Harrassment case above). 217.42.132.52 (talk) 08:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Name

Is his middle name really Andrew? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.233.32 (talk) 09:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

I checked the St Andrews website, and he's definitely Brian A. Lang. Are you saying that you think the A stands for something else? KarenSutherland (talk) 16:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)