Talk:Brian Booth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Brian Booth has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on August 31, 2006.
December 4, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.

	Cricket Portal Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability Brian Booth is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Portal	Brian Booth is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

I should be able to help contribute to this one and may be able to obtain a current photo as Brian Booth is a family friend. I'll see what I can do Mistertim 03:20, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

1. It is well written.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
3. It is broad in its coverage.
4. It is neutral.
5. It is stable.
6. It is illustrated, where possible and appropriate, by images — Although I prefer an image to be added to the lead section of the article, it is suitably illustrated to pass.

All in all, a good article that is on its way to FA quality. --D_arkF_alls ^talk 05:29, 4 December 2007 (UTC)