Talk:Brian Baird

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.

	Brian Baird is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. The options are: "FA", "A", "GA", "B", "Start", "Stub", "List", "Disambiguation", "Template", or "Category."
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. The options are: "Top", "High", "Mid", and "Low."
???	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", and "Event."

The Iraq policy portion of this entry was written by a moveon.org staffer, right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.40.18 (talk) 05:57, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

"Constituent response to Baird's position has been overwhelmingly negative." This parargraph is so BS! The left erupts in rage (six hundred people! The vast majority thereof! My God what a maddening crowd!) and their "viewpoint" is somehow passed on to the entire constituency, if not the entire American people. It goes to show that the Investor's Business Daily editorial on the matter (Traitor Against Surrender) is right on the money. Asteriks 09:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Folks, the purpose of this discussion page is to improve the article, not chat about our opinions of it. I realize the previous comments were on an earlier version of the article, but I think at present, we have a version that is very much in line with the cited sources (which are two of the region's papers of record.) Anyone with further concerns, please be specific. -Pete (talk) 08:33, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

I've removed "There has been strong negative response to Baird's change in position" as commentary.--Jersey Devil (talk) 21:09, 9 February 2008 (UTC)