British Rail Class 70
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| British Rail Class 70 | |
 20002 at East Croydon, 13 December 1967. By this time it had acquired a central headcode box and full yellow ends. Liveries carried were: Southern Green, Lined Black, Lined Green and finally (late 1960s) British Rail Blue. |
|
| Builder: | SR Ashford Works (2) BR Brighton Works (1) |
|---|---|
| Years built: | 1941, 1945, |
| Early numbers: | SR: CC1, CC3 BR: 20001–20003 |
| Number built: | 3 |
| Engine: | Booster, see text |
| Transmission: | Electric |
| Wheel layout: | Co-Co |
| Operators: | Southern Railway British Rail. |
The British Rail class 70 was a class of three 3rd rail Co-Co electric locomotives. The initial two were built by the Southern Railway at Ashford Works in 1941 and 1945 and were numbered CC1 and CC2. Electrical equipment was designed by Alfred Raworth and the body by Oliver Bulleid. CC2 was modified slightly from the original design by C. M. Cock who had succeeded Raworth as Electrical Engineer. The third was built by British Railways in 1948 and numbered 20003.
Contents |
[edit] Southern Railway nos. CC1 and CC2
Externally, it was clear the cab design owed a lot to Southern experience with the 2HAL multiple unit design. It has even been suggested that (in true Southern tradition) this was because the jigs for the welded cabs already existed and thus made for speedy and cheap construction. At the outbreak of war in 1939, most construction projects were put on hold in favour of the war effort. Construction of CC1 and CC2 was exempted from this because of promised savings in labour and fuel over steam locomotives. Construction was not smooth however and was brought to a halt several times due to shortage of resource.
[edit] British Railways no. 20003
After nationalisation in 1948, British Railways renumbered them 20001 and 20002 respectively. Also a third member of the class (20003 from new) was built at Brighton. S.B.Warder (later to become Chief Electrical Engineer of The British Transport Commission and architect of the 25 kV AC overhead system still in use today) was now SR Electrical Engineer and he modified the design somewhat. Although counted as the same class, 20003 was markedly different externally to its two earlier sisters being 2 inches (5cm) longer with flat 4SUB like cab ends. Again a suspected economy drive and arguably simpler (and therefore cheaper) design than the earlier two. Equipment changes also added 5 tons to the earlier 100 ton design.
[edit] Headcodes
All three locomotives were equipped with stencil headcodes but as it quickly became apparent that suitable headcodes for freight workings did not exist (nor did the combination of 2 numbers only at that time, provide the scope) they were fitted with steam locomotive style discs (6 for Southern Region) so the standard codes could be displayed. With standardisation came a whole set of new codes with letters as well (still only two characters) and all three locomotives were fitted with roller-blind headcodes and the front ends stripped of their disc codes and greatly cleaned up.
[edit] Technical details
The class soon proved their worth. The six traction motors providing 1470hp allowed them to handle 1000 ton freight and 750 ton passenger trains with ease.
[edit] Booster control
Being much shorter than the predominant multiple units, electric locomotives can suffer from a problem known as "gapping" - becoming marooned between supplies at the natural breaks in the third rail and snatching at the couplings whilst moving as they come on and off the power. The latter places undue stress on couplings and has been known to cause separations of a train. Raworth overcame this by having a motor-generator set with a large flywheel on the shaft between the two (leading to the nickname "boosters"). The traction current, instead of feeding the traction motors directly, powered a large motor which turned a shaft with the flywheel and fed into the generator. The flywheel ensured the generator continued to turn whilst no current was available from the third-rail, thus ensuring a continuous supply to the traction motors (from the generator).
Even while stationary, Class 70 produced a noticeable droning noise due to the motors turning inside the body. Two of these booster sets were fitted in each locomotive - one for each bogie. It was not, however, sufficient to allow the locomotives to work "off the juice" as the load on the generator whilst under power meant it would quickly consume the stored kinetic energy. They needed attentive driving also, to ensure they were not brought to a halt on a gap and the booster set be allowed to run down.
It is obvious that there would be losses throughout the system incurred in the conversion of electrical energy to kinetic and back again but Raworth mitigated this in the control mechanism. Instead of having large, heavily built resistances in the power lines for the motors, the 26 taps on the throttle changed resistances in the field coils of the generator. These correspondingly made the construction much lighter and easily maintained. Instead of "burning-up" unrequired power, the throttle simply altered how much power was generated and the traction motors were wired directly to the generator output.
[edit] Other features
All three were fitted with a tram style pantograph to allow them to work from overhead lines (catenary) erected in some yards (notably Hither Green, South East London) where it was deemed too dangerous to have third-rail with staff constantly at track level - doubly-so in wartime. This pantograph recessed into a cut-out on the roof when not in use to keep within the loading gauge.
The locomotives were fitted with electrically-powered train heating boilers to generate steam for train heating.
[edit] Successor and withdrawal
Although only three were built, they formed a "proof-of-concept" for booster-based electric locomotives and although often thought of as prototypes for the later Class 71, the latter differed greatly in its design and construction being based on Swiss practice (although the basic concept remained).
All three were withdrawn in the winter of 1968/1969 without receiving their TOPS numbers, although 20001 received BR corporate blue for its final years. None survived to preservation.
[edit] External links
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
