Britches (monkey)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Britches, as the ALF say they found him. The device on his head emitted a high-pitched noise every few minutes.
Britches, as the ALF say they found him. The device on his head emitted a high-pitched noise every few minutes.

Britches was the name given by researchers to a stump-tailed macaque monkey born into a breeding colony at the University of California, Riverside (UCR) in March 1985. He was removed from his mother at birth, had his eyelids sewn shut, and had an electronic sonar device attached to his head as part of a three-year sensory-deprivation study involving 24 infant monkeys.[1] The study, conducted by psychologist David H. Warren,[2] was one of a number that published data showing that neonate monkeys could learn to use information obtained from sensory substitution devices.[3][4]

Acting on a tip-off from a student, the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) removed Britches from the UCR laboratory on April 20, 1985, when he was five weeks old — along with 467 mice, cats, opossums, pigeons, rabbits, and rats[5][6] — during a raid that reportedly included equipment damage of nearly $700,000.[7][8][9] The ALF took footage of the raid and of Britches' condition when they found him,[10] passing it anonymously to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), who used it as the basis of their film, Britches.[11] According to Science Magazine reporting, PETA was a "mouthpiece for the unidentified liberationists".[9] As a result of the ensuing publicity, eight of the 17 studies interrupted by the raid were not restarted, and the university stopped allowing baby monkeys' eyes to be sewn shut, according to reports filed by the university with the government.[12][13] NIH conducted an eight month long investigation of the animal care program at UC-Riverside and concluded it was an "appropriate animal care program" and that no corrective action was necessary. [9]

A spokesman for the university criticized the ALF, saying that claims of animal mistreatment were "absolutely false," and that there would be long-term damage to some of the research projects, including those aimed at developing treatment for blind people.[14] Researchers alleged that activists had applied black mascara or paint to the monkey's eyelids to make the sutures look larger than they were, and that damage to the eyelids reported by a retired pediatrician on behalf of the ALF had, in fact, been caused by the pediatrician herself. The researchers also said that the sonar device had been removed and reattached by the ALF.[15]

Contents

[edit] The study

The experiments were designed to study the behavioral and neural development of monkeys reared with a sensory substitution device. Five groups of four macaques were to be raised from birth to three months, and one group to six months, blinded while wearing a Trisensor Aid (TSA), an experimental version of a blind travel aid, the Sonicguide. Other control groups were to wear the device with normal vision, or wear a dummy device with no vision. At the end of the experiment, the monkeys were to be killed, and the visual, auditory and motor areas in their brains would be studied.[2]

According to PETA's president Ingrid Newkirk, based on papers found in the lab by the ALF, the UCR researchers wrote that performing this study by artificially blinding the monkeys was necessary because "sufficient numbers of blind human infants [to study] were not within driving distance" of Riverside, and because the experimenters did not wish to be inconvenienced by the normal household routines if forced to work with blind children living at home.[15]

[edit] The raid

Reportedly as found by the ALF. The apparatus in the background was supplied as a surrogate mother.
Reportedly as found by the ALF. The apparatus in the background was supplied as a surrogate mother.

Ingrid Newkirk writes that the ALF was alerted to the laboratory's work by a student who had reported the Britches' situation to an animal protection group, Last Chance for Animals. An ALF contact volunteering there heard the complaint, and approached the student for more information.[16]

On April 21, 1985, ALF activists, including Sally S, a businesswoman in her mid-30s,[17] broke into the laboratory and removed Britches along with around 467 other animals, taking footage of the raid, which they handed anonymously to PETA.[18] Activists say they found Britches alone in a cage with bandages around his eyes and, attached to his head, a sonar device — a Trisensor aid — that emitted a high-pitched screech every few minutes. He was clinging to a device covered in towelling that had two fake nipples attached, apparently intended to serve as a surrogate mother. He was handed to an ALF volunteer, a woman, who drove him from California to Utah, where he was examined by a retired pediatrician who had agreed to help.

According to UCR officials, the ALF also smashed equipment resulting in nearly $700,000 damage. Theodore Hullar, UCR's executive vice chancellor, said that research had been "set back years."[19]

[edit] Medical report

Veterinarian ophthalmologist Dr. Ned Buyukmihci of the University of California, Davis, and founder of Veterinarians for Animal Rights, examined Britches after he was removed from the lab. He stated that the sutures used were too large and that the monkey's eye pads were filthy. He said: "There is no possible justification for this sloppy, painful experiment."[10]

The retired pediatrician, referred to as Bettina Flavioli in Ingrid Newkirk's account of the raid, examined Britches and recorded her report on video:

After his bandages were removed.
After his bandages were removed.
“ Attached to infant's head by means of bandage and tape is an apparatus of some sort with what appears to be some sort of electrical cord extending from it. It has been cut. Bilaterally are short lengths of tubing emerging from the bandage. Tape is in direct contact with the face and neck. Bandage lifted rostrally from right eye due to excessive moisture and right eye partially visible.

Beneath the bandages are two cotton pads, one for each eye ... Both pads are filthy and soaked with moisture. Bilaterally upper eyelids are sutured to lower eyelids. The sutures are grossly oversized for the purpose intended. Many of these sutures have torn through lid tissue resulting in multiple lacerations of the lids. There is an open space between upper and lower lids of both eyes of about one quarter inch, and sutures are contacting corneal tissue resulting in excessive tearing ...

Infant demonstrates photophobia. Penis of infant is edematous and inflamed. There are smegma accumulations. Generalized muscle development poor. Skin dry. Body odor foul.[10]

 ”

[edit] Reaction

PETA presented a film based on the ALF footage, which they called Britches.
PETA presented a film based on the ALF footage, which they called Britches.

PETA released a film called Britches that included footage from the raid,[10][20] showing how the monkey was removed from the lab, his condition when the ALF found him, his gradual recovery, and his transfer to an adoptive mother in a sanctuary in Mexico. The study was condemned by other scientists and the American Council of the Blind.[12][13] Dr. Grant Mack, president of the Council, called it "one of the most repugnant and ill-conceived boondoggles that I've heard about for a long time."[15]

A UCR spokesman criticized the ALF, saying that claims of animal mistreatment were "absolutely false," and that there would be long-term damage to some of the research projects.[14] Researchers alleged that activists had applied black mascara or paint to the monkey's eyelids to make the sutures look larger than they were, and that damage reported by an ALF veterinarian to the eyelids had been caused by the veterinarian himself. The researchers also said that the Trisensor Aid had been removed and reattached by the ALF.[15] The raid prompted the head of the National Institutes of Health to say that "thefts" of laboratory animals by animal rights groups could be considered acts of "terrorism," and may require enactment of federal laws.[21]

Sally Sperling, a psychologist working in the lab that was raided, told the American Psychological Association's Monitor on Psychology:

“ I can't describe in detail how [the lab] looked when I first saw it after the crime — the images are etched into my mind with acid ... My lab was my haven and refuge for eighteen years. Even when my experiment wasn't going well or the equipment was acting up, I wanted to be in my lab and missed it badly when I wasn't there. Now, I barely can make myself open the door.[22] ”

[edit] Britches after the raid

Britches after his removal from the laboratory.
Britches after his removal from the laboratory.

According to Ingrid Newkirk, Bettina Flavioli contacted a primatologist about Britches's future, and was referred to a sanctuary in Mexico that would take him. If not raised with other monkeys, the primatologist advised that Britches would grow to be aggressive and unmanageable. Following Flavioli's advice, the monkey was socialized by a number of handlers, to avoid his becoming too attached to any one of them.[23] When he was five months old, the retired pediatrician paid for the ALF to fly Britches to the sanctuary, where he was given to an elderly female macaque who had already raised several orphans.[10]

[edit] Reliability of PETA videos about ALF raids

A similar film was released after the ALF raid on the University of Pennsylvania one year earlier. The Office for Protection from Research Risks ran an investigation on the incident, due to concern about animal treatment in the labs. The investigation included comparing the video footage taken in the U Penn raid with the Unnecessary Fuss video produced by PETA and containing Ingrid Newkirk's voiceover. The PETA video "presented the case history of only one of approximately 150 animals that had received whiplash. By cleverly editing and inaccurate voice over, the viewer was led to believe that the inhumane treatment depicted on the film was repeated numerous times. In actual fact, one baboon was badly treated, and the film repeatedly showed the particular mistreatment while the commentator narrated that the mistreatment was repeated on a long series of different animals. In all, OPRR identified approximately 25 errors in the voice over description of what was taking place."[24]

[edit] See also

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. Free the Animals, Lantern Books, 2000, pp. 271-294.
  2. ^ a b "Abstract: Trisensor rearing with infant macaques", Crisp.
  3. ^ Behav Neurosci. 1987 Oct;101(5):738-41: "The ability of neonate macaque monkeys to learn to respond to artificial spatial sensory information was studied through the use of compact, head-worn, electronic spatial sonars with audible displays, which translate spatial information into auditory dimensions specifying distance, direction, and surface characteristics. Three animals were born in the dark and raised without vision for 1 to 3 months while wearing either the Binaural Sensory Aid (Animal 1; Kay, 1974) or the Trisensor (Animals 2 and 3; Easton & Jackson, 1983) airborne sonars. Each animal demonstrated alertness to information transmitted by the devices in spontaneous reaching or reinforced discrimination tasks, and more device-related, perceptual-motor activities were observed when the sensors were switched on than when they were switched off. The results show that neonate monkeys can learn effective use of information obtained from sensory substitution devices through unstructured interaction with the environment.
  4. ^ Seeing with Sound
  5. ^ "NIH Reauthorization and Protection of Health Facilities: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the Committee on Energy and Commerce," Washington 1991.
  6. ^ Franklin, Ben A. " Going to Extremes for 'Animal Rights'", The New York Times, August 30, 1987.
  7. ^ "Pro-Animal ALF Flouts Law in Name of Compassion," Sacramento Bee, February 15, 1998.
  8. ^ Philadelphia Inquirer, p. A10, April 22, 1985.
  9. ^ a b c "A pivotal year for lab animal welfare" Inset: "Centers targetted by activists"
    Author: Constance Holden
    Journal: Science 11 April 1986 232:249
  10. ^ a b c d e "The Story of Britches": Videotape of the Animal Liberation Front raid in which Britches was removed from the University of California, Riverside.
  11. ^ Francione, Gary. Rain Without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Temple University Press, 1996, p. 243.
  12. ^ a b Newkirk, Ingrid. Free the Animals, Lantern Books, 2000, p. 294.
  13. ^ a b Best, Steven & Nocella, Anthony J. Terrorist or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals. Lantern Books, 2004, p. 22.
  14. ^ a b "Group Says It 'Rescued' 260 Animals From Lab," Associated Press, April 21, 1985.
  15. ^ a b c d Newkirk, Ingrid. Free the Animals, Lantern Books, 2000, pp. 288-289.
  16. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. Free the Animals, Lantern Books, 2000, p. 274.
  17. ^ Steinbach, Alice. "Whose Life is more Important: An Animal's or a Child's," Glamour magazine, 1990.
  18. ^
    • "NIH reauthorization and protection of health facilities;: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the Committee on Energy and Commerce," Washington 1991, reported that 468 were taken: one monkey, nine opossums, 24 cats, 31 pigeons, 41 rabbits, 56 rats, and 306 mice.
    • The Chicago Tribune initially reported that 260 animals had been taken (April 21, 1985, p. 20.), later reporting 467 (April 28, 1985).
    • The New York Times reported 460 (Franklin, Ben A. " Going to Extremes for 'Animal Rights'", The New York Times, August 30, 1987).
    • Deborah Blum reported 460 (Blum, Deborah. The Monkey Wars, Oxford University Press, 1994, p. 116).
  19. ^ "Raid on animal lab 'sets back' research", Chicago Tribune, Apr 22, 1985, p. 10.
  20. ^ Phelps, Norm. The Longest Struggle: Animal Advocacy from Pythagoras to PETA. Lantern Books, 2007, p. 292.
  21. ^ "Crackdown urged in animal thefts", Chicago Tribune, April 26, 1985, p. 8.
  22. ^ Sperling, Sally. Monitor on Psychology cited in Newkirk 2000, pp. 290-291.
  23. ^ Newkirk, Ingrid. Free the Animals, Lantern Books, 2000, p. 292.
  24. ^ ILAR journal , published by a component of National Academy of Sciences

[edit] Further reading

  • David H. Warren's page at U.C. Riverside
  • Warren, David H. and Strelow, Edward R. Electronic Spatial Sensing for the Blind. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Visual Spatial Prosthesis for the Blind. Held at Lake Arrowhead, California, September 10-13, 1984. Springer, 1985.
  • Khan, Ali Yousaf Ali. "Angels of Mercy", Channel 4, June 24, 2006; includes footage of Britches.
  • Mann, Keith. From Dawn 'Til Dusk. Puppy Pincher Press, 2007; features Britches on the front cover.


[edit] External Links